Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
Are you ok? This is bizarrely aggressive behavior from you.
Arabs are actually discriminated against in the West so no, its no the same thing. men are not. nor are whites. nor are Jews.
Arabs are actually discriminated against in the West so no, its no the same thing. men are not. nor are whites. nor are Jews.
You don't think Jews are discriminated against in the west? Sure, they mostly do pretty well regardless, but there are still large numbers of people who don't trust or actually hate Jews, both on the far right and the far left.
You don't think Jews are discriminated against in the west? Sure, they mostly do pretty well regardless, but there are still large numbers of people who don't trust or actually hate Jews, both on the far right and the far left.
Yeah but have you considered that Israel exists and therefore hatred against Jews doesnβt matter?
“If a white man wants to lynch me, that's his problem. If he's got the power to lynch me, that's my problem. Racism is not a question of attitude; it's a question of power."
Stokely Carmichael
βIf a white man wants to lynch me, that's his problem. If he's got the power to lynch me, that's my problem. Racism is not a question of attitude; it's a question of power."
Stokely Carmichael
Sadly, nearly any group of people has the power to torture and kill nearly any other single person, regardless of reason or prejudice.
who even cares what word you use. call it racial prejudice or gender prejudice if you think certain terms should be reserved for minorities. does that mean that itβs ok for some people to be prejudiced simpliciter? I donβt see how that follows.
Makes perfect sense, because men are famously not engineered to react violently to threats.
Just unbelievable how insultingly stupid conservative faux-science pablum is. You'd think even Kelhus would be offended by how dim these hucksters take their audiences for. He doesn't even know how to use the word "literal" correctly, for chrissake.
Now that the word 'literally' includes contradictory definitions, it's impossible to use that word incorrectly.
So, a black person cannot be charged with a hate crime if s/he is targeting white folks?
This is a problem. Some people see things that aren't there. Perhaps things that have happened to them in the past has created this paranoia. Some people have a dark cloud that hovers over them. they see trouble everywhere they look. Some people go looking for trouble and they inevitably find it.
No even a little bit. I donβt hate men in general or as individuals; I do hate the system of patriarchy and the harm it causes and the complacency that most men seem to have adopted, even the so-called βgood onesβ. But two of my closest friends in the world are men, have been my friends for over a decade, and I love them deeply and they love me and know that when I speak about
π
Your feelings have been made clear in dozens of other prior posts, so you can't fault anyone for reading subsequent posts contextually.
If you were new to this forum and just happened to look at all of her anti man posts there would be zero doubt in your mind that she hates men. If you take out the one or two kiss asses in this forum everybody else would agree that based on her writings she hates men. The irony and hypocrisy that she temp-bans individuals for misogyny while continuing to spew her misandry is crazy. I'm shocked it's allowed.
If you were new to this forum and just happened to look at all of her anti man posts there would be zero doubt in your mind that she hates men. If you take out the one or two kiss asses in this forum everybody else would agree that based on her writings she hates men. The irony and hypocrisy that she temp-bans individuals for misogyny while continuing to spew her misandry is cr
Any man that hasn't encountered CN's takes on men from a woman probably hasn't had too many actual close relationships with women.
Makes perfect sense, because men are famously not engineered to react violently to threats.
Just unbelievable how insultingly stupid conservative faux-science pablum is. You'd think even Kelhus would be offended by how dim these hucksters take their audiences for. He doesn't even know how to use the word "literal" correctly, for chrissake.
Crossnerd is the one pushing anti-science blank slatism ideology. Not me.
Of course males are (relatively) engineered to react violently to threats. This is something that even a 5 year old intuitively understands, and every scientific study on the subject ever undertaken has confirmed.
I would take an insane amount of over-educated ideologically programming for someone to believe otherwise.
βSome ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.β
The quote in question postulates that because in our current environment we are running new software on old hardware, there is incongruences that create pathologies.
FWIW I would have to find a transcript of the interview, but Brett postulates that pathologies affecting both males and females are due to environmental incongruence with biology. With the biggest disruption being the invention of birth control.
Any man that hasn't encountered CN's takes on men from a woman probably hasn't had too many actual close relationships with over-educated Western women.
--If you dont associate specifically with Western high educated women it probably wouldn't be too hard to go your whole life and never find a woman who would seriously argue that all behavioral differences between men and women are environment; and the Western liberal men specifically are holding women down.
If you were new to this forum and just happened to look at all of her anti man posts there would be zero doubt in your mind that she hates men.
The same can be said about you and women. Your posting makes it clear you hate women (likely because you are incapable of sexually gratifying them) and view them only as semen depositories.