President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump

I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?

So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at

105 Views
28 April 2019 at 04:18 AM
Reply...

39479 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

Am I hallucinating by remembering one of MAGA's main selling point being to stop being the world police, less foreign interventionnism , no boots on the ground, etc... ?


hypocrisy and chaos


by Victor

he is not a dictator lol. but regardless, anything other than full throated support for Maduro and his release is complicity. esp from powerful Dem politicians in the country that just committed the crime. this mealy mouthed bullshit about him being a dictator, or authoritarian, or stealing an election (lol), or Venezuela being a failed state is simply justification for the

Is this the point where you break back to being a dem?


by housenuts

Libs are so funny. They've been calling for Maduro's head for years. Then Trump actually does it and they are all upset about it. Everyone was happy when Obama went into Pakistan and got Bin Laden. Great job there. But orange man go into Venezuela and get Maduro (who they all wanted to get), omg let's set our hair on fire about this.

I find Libs to be perpetually angry people who find everything offensive. It tracks that even when things are good for them they would be angry and offended.


by mongidig

I find Libs to be perpetually angry people who find everything offensive. It tracks that even when things are good for them they would be angry and offended.

Weird way to come out and identify yourself as Lib.


by mongidig

I find Libs to be perpetually angry people who find everything offensive. It tracks that even when things are good for them they would be angry and offended.

lol the projection


by diebitter

lol the projection

What "projection"? I don't find anything offensive. I'm not on these forums all day everyday crying about a leader of a country I don't even live in.


I have been pretty mad for the last year and a half any time I think about the 2nd Trump administration


by mongidig

What "projection"? I don't find anything offensive. I'm not on these forums all day everyday crying about a leader of a country I don't even live in.



by mongidig

What "projection"? I don't find anything offensive. I'm not on these forums all day everyday crying about a leader of a country I don't even live in.

Perpetual offense is one of the trademarks of conservatism. There was a huge crackdown and firing spree with even an arrest after people made jokes about Charlie Kirk. You can’t even properly grade assignments handed by low performing whites now because they’ll call turning point and get professors and TAs fired for holding white christians to the same standard as regular people.


by ecriture d'adulte

Perpetual offense is one of the trademarks of conservatism.

I don't think it was conservatives who invented 'micro-aggressions', the institutional sacralising of people taking unjustified offence over made-up trivia and the whole Maoist apparatus of hostile HR interviews, compulsory self-criticism, struggle sessions and sackings and cancellation that goes with that.


Right. By that standard Apple, Microsoft, Exxon etc are all just extensions of the Democratic Party and low performing whites sitting at home outraged at companies they don’t have the skills to work at are the conservative base. HR guidelines is not really a national issue to anybody but the perpetually offended. It’s certainly not something I ever remember Obama making a big deal out of


by 57 On Red
by ecriture d'adulte

Perpetual offense is one of the trademarks of conservatism.

I don't think it was conservatives who invented 'micro-aggressions',

Right, well-meaning liberals made up the term "micro-aggressions" because conservatives can't stand being called bigots directly, and yet the conservatives are still mad about it somehow.


by mongidig

What "projection"? I don't find anything offensive. I'm not on these forums all day everyday crying about a leader of a country I don't even live in.

So the party that welcomes people w/ all various world views, sex orientations, etc... and has the lowest domestic, and mass killing rates is the angry party, VS

The party that is bigoted, commits the most domestic violence and mass killings, and leans fascist w/ it's revolutions... lol

If you see a peace symbol on the back of the car, and you had to make a forced bet if that person was liberal or conservative, you'd bet ?

On a semi related note - The funniest thing w/ this whole trans issue, which has rage baited all the right-wingers... the fault you can blame on the left about this issue is the same one you can on many things where they can get a bit lost in the sauce... is that they can be too tolerant and peace keeping, which can sometimes violate boundary issues for people. The more accepting you are of people, the less boundaries you have and vice versa. There's often a middle ground that's missed because of this.


by FreakDaddy

So the party that welcomes people w/ all various world views, sex orientations, etc... and has the lowest domestic, and mass killing rates is the angry party, VSThe party that is bigoted, commits the most domestic violence and mass killings, and leans fascist w/ it's revolutions... lolIf you see a peace symbol on the back of the car, and you had to make a forced bet if that per

I should be more specific. I'm not talking about all Democrats. I'm talking about the neurotic far left liberal types that happen to populate these forums.

If I see a peace symbol on a car I think this person is just self promoting themselves as a good person. The reality is most people are for peace but don't feel the need to advertise. I would bet this person is a Democrat.

Most Conservatives don't have a major issue with Trans or homosexual people. They just don't like the agenda forced upon them. For example and I will wrap a spoiler around this because it has to do with the show Stranger Things.

Spoiler
Show

After hinting about Wills closet homosexuality the creators of the show felt it was necessary to have a 10 minute coming out scene while the world was coming to an end. It felt very forced and unnecessary.


by mongidig

I should be more specific. I'm not talking about all Democrats. I'm talking about the neurotic far left liberal types that happen to populate these forums. If I see a peace symbol on a car I think this person is just self promoting themselves as a good person. The reality is most people are for peace but don't feel the need to advertise. I would bet this person is a Democrat. M

I don't find that to be true. I know a lot of conservatives, and nearly all of them (like 99%) are racist, and homophobic. Some will say they don't care about homosexuality, and those tend to be the ones that have family or someone they know who is gay. And they are probably OK w/ it to some degree, but when they are alone, I've heard them all speak - and deep down the ones that say that are OK tolerate it, but still will make comments or jokes that aren't cool. Both sides of my family are almost entirely conservative, and probably pretty representatives of a wide range of conservatives. I literally have everything from hillbillies to wealthy republicans, and everything in between... even conservative politicians in my family. They twist themselves in knots trying to convince anyone who will listen how they aren't racists or anti-trans, etc... it's like nails on a chalkboard having to listen to something you know isn't true because you've heard them say otherwise at other times.

I have a spoiler too -

Spoiler
Show

If you don't have an issue w/ homosexuality, then scenes like you described won't bother you. This "forced" agenda is institutions normalizing something that you don't want normalized, so you try to find blame elsewhere (institutions forcing ideologies on you), for your bigotry.


The forced agenda crap always makes me laugh. They never have a problem with a heterosexual agenda even though that is 1000x more in the face of everyone every single day.


by Gorgonian

The forced agenda crap always makes me laugh. They never have a problem with a heterosexual agenda even though that is 1000x more in the face of everyone every single day.

Do heterosexuals have an agenda? Are they trying to normalize something that is not normal?


by mongidig

Do heterosexuals have an agenda? Are they trying to normalize something that is not normal?

You just told on yourself... and probably don't even realize it.


Some do yes, and yes some are.

Homophobia is not normal. Homosexuality is.


by FreakDaddy

You just told on yourself... and probably don't even realize it.

Yep, that's the thing. When you point out that they aren't doing even a significant fraction of what heterosexuals are doing, they either have to admit they are wrong or tell on themselves. It's fun to watch. Most of the smart ones realize they are cornered and just don't answer. Then there's this clown.


This whole greenlandÂ’s threats is completelety surreal.
Remember people here saying he ́s trolling ?
Then you have rubio saying that when Trump says something, he means it.
Miller and wifey doubling in, etc...

If that were to happen, the only thing to reverse/oppose it would have to come from the inside.
I canÂ’t see other countries going the military route to prevent it.
What I can imagine is a complete clash between Europe and USA , with US realigning entirely with new partners.


by weeeez

This whole greenlandÂ’s threats is completelety surreal. Remember people here saying he ́s trolling ?Then you have rubio saying that when Trump says something, he means it. Miller and wifey doubling in, etc...If that were to happen, the only thing to reverse/oppose it would have to come from the inside. I canÂ’t see other countries going the military route to prevent it

Trump is sort of right - it would be much better in their hands than Denmark for the sake of the EU as there is no way that Denmark are preventing an incursion from Russia or China.


by bundy5

Trump is sort of right - it would be much better in their hands than Denmark for the sake of the EU as there is no way that Denmark are preventing an incursion from Russia or China.

It doesn't matter who Denmark can fight off. Greenland is Nato. China or Russia isn't taking over Greenland. It would bring in the US. I mean, Russia might if they decide to go full **** it mode but China is not.


by weeeez

This whole greenlandÂ’s threats is completelety surreal. Remember people here saying he ́s trolling ?Then you have rubio saying that when Trump says something, he means it. Miller and wifey doubling in, etc...If that were to happen, the only thing to reverse/oppose it would have to come from the inside. I canÂ’t see other countries going the military route to prevent it

Europe aint gonna do a gd thing. they ate **** when the USA blew up their pipeline. they ate **** when Trump made them pay for all the Ukraine weapons. there are only a few countries that stand up to the USa and ironically enough you hate all of those countries.

Reply...