In other news

In other news

In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a

12 October 2020 at 08:13 AM
Reply...

14508 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by Victor

bc he often explicitly speaks of the inherent supremacy of Western society and culture compared to the Arab world. like, its not even latent with him.

Most people don’t think that Western values are worth defending because of inherent reasons. I think those reasons are more historically contingent and subject to change.


by geezerchess

Probably nobody who posts regularly in a politics forum has any desire to get over themselves. Including you and me ofc.

I read the recent bump posts in a thread and above them were posts by some guy called lagtight. Christ that guy really sucked badly. Wonder what happened to him?


by checkraisdraw

Most people don’t think that Western values are worth defending because of inherent reasons. I think those reasons are more historically contingent and subject to change.

western values would be a very good idea.


by jalfrezi

I read the recent bump posts in a thread and above them were posts by some guy called lagtight. Christ that guy really sucked badly. Wonder what happened to him?

That lagtight dude was an idiot.

Surprised he didn't get permabanned a lot sooner than he did.

Glad he's long gone.




by tame_deuces

Headlines like "Millennials aren't buying large and very expensive houses, and why that is a problem", "How boomers made houses too expensive for Millennials to buy" are mostly engagement bait.

It's all just rehashed copywriting techniques from the early 1900s. I've been doing it for years. Times and circumstances change but people having pain-points will always exist.

--‐---

How to Win Internet Forum Debates Without Actually Being Right!

Are you tired of being mocked in every single thread you post in? Ridiculed for “bad takes,” buried under downvotes—or worse, getting repeatedly banned before you even make your point?

I was too for years… until I discovered the one simple trick that turns every argument in your favor.... even when you don’t have the facts!

Now, the choice is yours: will you finally take control of your online arguments, or keep suffering like I did?

☐ Yes, I want to finally dominate every forum debate. Show me the simple trick that turns my replies into unstoppable, mic drop arguments!

☐ No, I want to keep getting ratio’d, ignored, and banned. I’m fine staying the forum punching bag I’ve always been.


Is the mic drop to refer to human beings as insects?


Huh?


by John21

Huh?

This:

by John21

You're not talking in terms of economics proper. You're talking in terms of Modern Monetary Theory, which has as much to do with the actual economy (Gross Domestic "Product") as math does to physics. People don't eat bonds and money. Or just because housing prices double doesn't mean the food supply for the termites living in them doubles too. That's their balance sheet problem


Oh okay. And I'll assume that explains your cockroach comment, too. The economics is over your heads:

[QUOTE=ChatGPT]The poster isn’t talking about physical housing or people literally living in it. They’re using **“termites” metaphorically to represent economic actors or dependents** who rely on assets (like houses) **for value or sustenance in an economic sense**.

So in this sentence:

> “just because housing prices double doesn't mean the food supply for the termites living in them doubles too”

…they’re pointing out that **an increase in asset prices (like housing) doesn’t create more real goods or wealth for those dependent on those assets**. The “termites” are **metaphorical claimants on the asset’s value**, not people or literal insects. It’s a colorful way of saying: rising prices don’t magically increase actual material resources.

In short: the poster is using **termites as a metaphor for economic dependents in a balance sheet sense**, not insulting anyone or literally describing humans.

If you want, I can map **the whole metaphor to MMT vs GDP concepts** so it’s crystal clear what the poster is arguing. Do you want me to do that?
[/QUOTE]


by John21

Oh okay. And I'll assume that explains your cockroach comment, too. The economics is over your heads:

That dude just looks for trouble. It was pretty obvious what your comment was about. He probably gets offended drinking a glass of water in the morning.


by Elway

That dude just looks for trouble. It was pretty obvious what your comment was about. He probably gets offended drinking a glass of water in the morning.

I don't need to 'look' for trouble. It's right there for all to see.


by Elway

That dude just looks for trouble. It was pretty obvious what your comment was about. He probably gets offended drinking a glass of water in the morning.

I thought it was obvious. Didn't even occur to me he was referring to a post I made in another thread. I was just curious how he read "insect" into my post upthread.


I know this isn't the golf forum, but JFC Tiger.


Tiger's drives on the golf course much better than his drives in his car.


Breaking!!

The Vise President is officially going after Ihlhan Omar for immigration fraud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HsJk-wQ...




by geezerchess

I don't need to 'look' for trouble. It's right there for all to see.

Here’s the problem with you. I wasn’t talking about you but you still felt the need to respond.


Also, how did he get so old so quick?


by Elway

Also, how did he get so old so quick?

Did Tiger get old quicker than other people you know about?


Lower lifeforms can struggle with object permanence.


by Elway

Here’s the problem with you. I wasn’t talking about you but you still felt the need to respond.

I certainly did not feel a need to respond, but I did have a desire to respond.



Russia and Putin are infinitely more moral than the USA


by Victor

Russia and Putin are infinitely more moral than the USA

Infinitely more?


by Victor

Russia and Putin are infinitely more moral than the USA

Whatever, dude.

Reply...