President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
funny you don't understand that i do find portions of MAGA redicolous. But a normie liberal is objectively worse than a crazy MAGA most of the times.For example: nothing in MAGA even remotely comes close to "pregnant men". Every single person who isn't utterly disgusted and horrified by the fact that culture went as crazy as to claim men can get pregnant, is a lot worse than th
lol no u .
As if many liberal republicans (yeah they did exist) were not exiting Republican because of maga movements ….
Ps: don’t conflict woke with liberalism .
Tho I’m not surprise u do .
lol no u .
As if many liberal republicans (yeah they did exist) were not exiting Republican because of maga movements ….
Ps: don’t conflict woke with liberalism .
Tho I’m not surprise u do .
who , among liberals, was fully opposed to puberty blockers for minors with gender disphoria, hormones for minors, and for taxpayers to cover elective cosmetic surgeries of trans people? i don't confuse the 2, the 2 are the same.
Who among liberals was fully oppose to all forms of affirmative action? the most racist policy the USA had in the last 50+ decades?
who , among liberals, was fully opposed to puberty blockers for minors with gender disphoria, hormones for minors, and for taxpayers to cover elective cosmetic surgeries of trans people? i don't confuse the 2, the 2 are the same.
Who among liberals was fully oppose to all forms of affirmative action? the most racist policy the USA had in the last 50+ decades?
This post is essentially a list of lies that have been directly debunked towards the same exact claims before
Multiple times
You have a problem
who , among liberals, was fully opposed to puberty blockers for minors with gender disphoria, hormones for minors, and for taxpayers to cover elective cosmetic surgeries of trans people? i don't confuse the 2, the 2 are the same.
Who among liberals was fully oppose to all forms of affirmative action? the most racist policy the USA had in the last 50+ decades?
I am against it for one .
And I’m surely more liberal then conservatives…
To believe only conservatives are not woke is pretty stupid .
funny you don't understand that i do find portions of MAGA redicolous. But a normie liberal is objectively worse than a crazy MAGA most of the times.For example: nothing in MAGA even remotely comes close to "pregnant men". Every single person who isn't utterly disgusted and horrified by the fact that culture went as crazy as to claim men can get pregnant, is a lot worse than th
Nice cope. Nobody thinks biological men can become pregnant.
So it's not like i don't recognize MAGA mistakes. Their position on 1HB visas is wrong for example. Their love of tariffs is wrong. But they are still far less dangerous than anyone who doesn't get extremely angry at anyone who claims men can get pregnant.
It's not that i fail to understand MAGA has problematic components. It's you failing to understand modern radical liberalism is a toxic cancer fully incompatible with civilization.
Based off saying that biological females can get pregnant? lol
This post is essentially a list of lies that have been directly debunked towards the same exact claims before
Multiple times
You have a problem
This
sure meanwhile i predicted the federal circuit court of appeal would have destroyed Trump IEEPA tariffs, i wrote about that for like a month (with many people here claiming that no, courts don't matter anymore, they all defer to Trump and other bullshit like that), and today i was proven completly right.
So who actually has the proper grasp on the USA?
I'm glad to see the ruling, but I'll believe it's settled after the Supreme Court rules the same way and the tariffs go away.
Where did i say biological men? people accepting that the word man can describe anyone who isn't a biological man are the problem. Even needing to say "biological man" is disgusting and utterly horrendous, a deep violation of reality. Biological men are the only men that can every exist, the word man only applies to them and attempting otherwise is fully absurd.
If you don't get up in arms and violently reject the proposition that "man" can apply to women that think they are men, you are worse than the worst maga can ever possibly be.
You are denyin gone of the most fundamental basic truth of human reality, you are actually completly gone.
I am saying that anyone who doesn't completly reject gender theory is far worse than the worst possible radical bullshit on the right, including bill gates covid graphite vaccines and everything else.
The problem here is that if someone signed off on blowing up my street to get guy two houses down
because he was a bad dude, i woundnt be comforted much knowing that the objective was not my house and that my kids werent the initial target.
Sure, that may be a problem. But before we get into any normative stance we have to have conceptual and epistemic clarity. Just throwing around the most incendiary rhetoric is exactly how we got into a national debate between communists and fascists, something nobody sane wants.
funny you don't understand that i do find portions of MAGA redicolous. But a normie liberal is objectively worse than a crazy MAGA most of the times.For example: nothing in MAGA even remotely comes close to "pregnant men". Every single person who isn't utterly disgusted and horrified by the fact that culture went as crazy as to claim men can get pregnant, is a lot worse than th
You're definitely out of touch with America if you think it's recognized by the general culture that "men can get pregnant".
Sane people don't get "extremely angry" about a minority believing that because it doesn't matter in the least.
I get much more upset at the much larger portion of society who has the even crazier belief that an invisible being created the universe and is deserving of worship. I'm upset about that because it affects society infinitely more than the belief that men can get pregnant.
Nice cope. Nobody thinks biological men can become pregnant.
Based off saying that biological females can get pregnant? lol
The funny thing , many times Luciiom been called a fascist and he defend himself by saying he cannot be because he had “some libertarian” beliefs .
But how quick he is to bundle everything in 1 little neat package and ready to accuse everyone being something based on one little thing …
Binary thinking does that .
For example: nothing in MAGA even remotely comes close to "pregnant men". Every single person who isn't utterly disgusted and horrified by the fact that culture went as crazy as to claim men can get pregnant, is a lot worse than the most radical and crazy MAGA can ever be.
Pregnant Men is not something that is part of any avg. citizens lives left or right dude.
A huge chunk of the right despised everything about where things had gotten by the 90s and wanted nothing more than to turn back the clock/make other changes off on their religious etc trip. A lot of other conservatives are barely cognizant of the the ways they lives their lives these days that wouldn't have even been possible without things loosening up.
You're definitely out of touch with America if you think it's recognized by the general culture that "men can get pregnant". Sane people don't get "extremely angry" about a minority believing that because it doesn't matter in the least. I get much more upset at the much larger portion of society who has the even crazier belief that an invisible being created the universe and is
not by the general culture, by the general democrat
SCOTUS will trash his hopes, but it will take some time yet
Where did i say biological men? people accepting that the word man can describe anyone who isn't a biological man are the problem. Even needing to say "biological man" is disgusting and utterly horrendous, a deep violation of reality. Biological men are the only men that can every exist, the word man only applies to them and attempting otherwise is fully absurd.If you don't get
I mean if that’s not the issue then we can just come up with another category to call the people that feel more comfortable presenting as the opposite sex, as has happened in many different cultures.
So I’m not in agreement it’s an affront to anything, I think it’s well in line with our biology as it is a cross-cultural phenomenon, which is really weird if it just happened to be an invention of modern times.
I do agree that the leftist line and especially certain “queer theorists” get into some yikesy territory though.
I'm pretty sure fewer than half of Democrats would say that as well.
But the people who do believe me do not affect my life except in the tiniest roundabout way, while the majority of people who have a much crazier belief effect me greatly and in a negative way every day.
Lol, he waffled a dozen times on the tariffs himself, but if they go away America will be destroyed. It sure seemed like we were here and doing pretty well before he took office.
I mean if that’s not the issue then we can just come up with another category to call the people that feel more comfortable presenting as the opposite sex, as has happened in many different cultures.So I’m not in agreement it’s an affront to anything, I think it’s well in line with our biology as it is a cross-cultural phenomenon, which is really weird if it just happened to be
the invention of modern times is using the same identical word to cover for a delusion.
It would be like forcing people to use "landlord" to refer to someone who squats rent free in someone else apartment
Lol, he waffled a dozen times on the tariffs himself, but if they go away America will be destroyed. It sure seemed like we were here and doing pretty well before he took office.
the claim of purported disaster if his decisions are reversed is his best bet to have a shred of a chance with SCOTUS. But given the 3 liberals will vote against (this time, helping the nation), it's very very very very hard to think there won't be 2 among the 6 conservatives that will uphold the textual meaning of IEEPA.
I don't see gorsuch coming out and claiming IEEPA allows for tariff setting, as it obviously doesn't, and he never, ever pretends to have the power to invent words that don't appear in the text. Finding the 5th vote shouldn't be hard.
It's been around forever. Even right there in the boot back in the olden days and probably right back to the caveperson days. Get over it 😀
As always I remain comically amused by the duality of lambasting Lucy while also making sure that snowflake feels heard and is treated like a real human boy
As always I remain convinced only 1 of those 2 things are required
"the general democrat" is like, oh idk, cuck gooner. if "the general democrat" has radicalized you, turned you from a fake lil libertarian boy into full-blown unapologetic lil benito, then you're insane
(lucy is indeed insane)
Interesting that a Federal Appeals Court has ruled Trump's Executive Orders installing tariffs as unconstitutional.
I'm not a Trump fan at all .... but I'm concerned about a ruling which might impair the national security interests of the country.
Withdrawing tariffs means pure capitalism prevails ... buy low / sell high.
But the US courts don't have the power to ensure that global suppliers continue to keep supply lines open forever and this creates a national security vulnerability down the line if those supply chains are removed.
A resilient nation must be able to ensure access to necessary goods and services and if we don't have the means to protect sovereign sources of production, then we're setting ourselves up to be extorted by foreign powers.
