President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
freakdaddy do you understand that you could run a top 10 of the states with the highest percentage of white or asian residents in and it would be almost identical to every top10 positive list you just posted?
and the states with the highest black / natives percentages of the population are almost identical to the negative top 10 lists you made? except blacks /natives in republican states don't usually vote republican?
is that element clear to you?
do you understand race is the determinant for basic
I mean it’s pretty slippery in the sense that race being the determinant could go either way, and them voting for dems could be because the other people just suck that much.
you’re trying to derive causation from correlation without offering the causal mechanism.
freakdaddy do you understand that you could run a top 10 of the states with the highest percentage of white or asian residents in and it would be almost identical to every top10 positive list you just posted?
and the states with the highest black / natives percentages of the population are almost identical to the negative top 10 lists you made? except blacks /natives in republican states don't usually vote republican?
is that element clear to you?
do you understand race is the determinant for basic
I think if you are going to make a post like this making these claims then you should follow up on his list yourself for all of us.
racist? pointing out the lists you made can be superimposed with percentage of white residents in those states is a fact.
blacks are more obese than whites btw (it's actually black women being far more obese)
ofc they have far worse health outcomes than everyone else as everyone knows so where you have more blacks and natives life expectancy in the state is lower and every other healthcare variable is worse just because of that.
the derangement of leftists here calling RACIST an uncontroversial c
Hey ****nuts, we can't read your chart, but the evidence doesn't even support your statement.
According to recent data, the top 10 U.S. states with the highest adult obesity rates are:
West Virginia: 41.2%- Republican - 3% black
Mississippi: 40.1%- Republican - 36%
Arkansas: 40.0%- Republican - 15%
Louisiana: 39.9%- Republican - 31%
Alabama: 39.3%- Republican - 26%
Oklahoma: 38.2%- Republican - 7%
Indiana: 37.8%- Republican - 9%
Iowa: 37.8%- Republican - 3.8%
Tennessee: 37.6%- Republican - 15.9
Nebraska: 36.6%- Republican - 4.8
Guess what? White people are still the overwhelming majority in all those states
I mean it’s pretty slippery in the sense that race being the determinant could go either way, and them voting for dems could be because the other people just suck that much.
you’re trying to derive causation from correlation without offering the causal mechanism.
all I ask is to compare whites in state x to whites in state y, differences exist but are far smaller than what freakdaddy wanted to use to imply misgoverning where it's mostly just about racial composition of the state
I think if you are going to make a post like this making these claims then you should follow up on his list yourself for all of us.
why are Idaho and Nebraska, filled to the brim of rednecks, in the top10 of freakdaddy lists, while Missouri is at the bottom low of another, if not for the racial composition of those states? governance is identical
racist? pointing out the lists you made can be superimposed with percentage of white residents in those states is a fact.
blacks are more obese than whites btw (it's actually black women being far more obese)
ofc they have far worse health outcomes than everyone else as everyone knows so where you have more blacks and natives life expectancy in the state is lower and every other healthcare variable is worse just because of that.
the derangement of leftists here calling RACIST an uncontroversial cla
As usual the picture is more complex than you're prepared to admit.
It's possible that some body shapes may be more valued in some cultures than others, but it's certain that the poor have lower life expectancies than wealthier people (worse food, worse housing, more stress, more likely to be the target of violence etc) and that black people make up a disproportionate number of poor people.
SUMMARY: you're an idiot.
why are Idaho and Nebraska, filled to the brim of rednecks, in the top10 of freakdaddy lists, while Missouri is at the bottom low of another, if not for the racial composition of those states? governance is identical
bru, the #1 fat state is 91% white 3.2% black and 0.09% indian
The #1 fit state is 43% black .3% indian and only 39% white
Hey ****nuts, we can't read your chart, but the evidence doesn't even support your statement.
According to recent data, the top 10 U.S. states with the highest adult obesity rates are:
West Virginia: 41.2%- Republican - 3% black
Mississippi: 40.1%- Republican - 36%
Arkansas: 40.0%- Republican - 15%
Louisiana: 39.9%- Republican - 31%
Alabama: 39.3%- Republican - 26%
Oklahoma: 38.2%- Republican - 7%
Indiana: 37.8%- Republican - 9%
Iowa: 37.8%- Republican - 3.8%
Tennessee: 37.6%- Republican - 15.9
Nebrask
4 of the top 5 have more blacks than the rest of the nation (12% is the average) yet you use this to disprove my claim? lol
As usual the picture is more complex than you're prepared to admit.
It's possible that some body shapes may be more valued in some cultures than others, but it's certain that the poor have lower life expectancies than wealthier people (worse food, worse housing, more stress, more likely to be the target of violence etc) and that black people make up a disproportionate number of poor people.
SUMMARY: you're an idiot.
and? still if you have more blacks in your state that's what drags down your average, not governance, if blacks perform similarly elsewhere and you just happen to have more of them.
Rurals are incredibly obese ir you have the misfortune of having to go to a county Trump won by 30 or 40. Would be almost as hard to find a non obese person as it would be to find someone who could pass high school math.
if apprehended later no, en flagrante where you cannot necessarily differentiate between those who were violent and those who just queued up after them obviously yes? the area should have been treated like a war zone from the moment the first act of violence against property or people happened, shooting to kill all rioters, ofc starting from the front.
Pretty sure it would have ended within 2 minutes with every rioter face down on the ground, and 20-30-50 (whatever it was needed to get them all o
You didn't answer my question. You stated that violent protesters on January 6 should be killed. My question was whether you thought a president who pardoned people who acted "violently" (according to your definition of the word) on January 6 should be killed.
4 of the top 5 have more blacks than the rest of the nation (12% is the average) yet you use this to disprove my claim? lol
Half have less than average and half have more than average. Only 3 of the largest black populated states are in the top 10 of fatest states, including the #1 fit state being the #1 black population in the country, with more black people than white.
Like, all the evidence points to you spouting nonsense out your ass. Its an abject owning to your entire thesis. You should retract your statement and take a break in shame.
You didn't answer my question. You stated that violent protesters on January 6 should be killed. My question was whether you thought a president who pardoned people who acted "violently" (according to your definition of the word) on January 6 should be killed.
yes I answered in another post to that when I realized that was your question
Half have less than average and half have more than average. Only 3 of the largest black populated states are in the top 10 of fatest states, including the #1 fit state being the #1 black population in the country, with more black people than white.
Like, all the evidence points to you spouting nonsense out your ass. Its an abject owning to your entire thesis. You should retract your statement and take a break in shame.
lol you want to deny that having more blacks and less Asians automatically raises your obesity rate a lot as a state.
it's fine, I don't expect numeracy from you.
the "more black people than whites" "state would the DC that isn't a state? and the population of which is in part ultra-selected nationwide among people who are better than average for health and income by idiosyncratic factors linked to work in government?
we are at the "it's fascist to say blacks have lower life expectancy" phase of leftism I see
if only it was only life expectation we were talking about...
freakdaddy do you understand that you could run a top 10 of the states with the highest percentage of white or asian residents in and it would be almost identical to every top10 positive list you just posted?
and the states with the highest black / natives percentages of the population are almost identical to the negative top 10 lists you made? except blacks /natives in republican states don't usually vote republican?
is that element clear to you?
do you understand race is the determinant for basic
life expectancy, mortality at birth, income, any health outcome, whatever you look at, in every state, blacks and natives have worse numbers than whites and Asians.
so any state with higher (whites and Asians)/(black and natives) ratios than another will have better outcome for basically everything we care about just because of racial makeup of the state itself.
ofc the rare exception that doesn't change the correlation can exist.
i am excluding Hispanics because they are fairly in the middle of everything and a growing portion of them identifies as white so that would complicate the matter a lot.
lol you want to deny that having more blacks and less Asians automatically raises your obesity rate a lot as a state.
it's fine, u don't expect numeracy from you.
the "more black people than whites" "state would the DC that isn't a state? and the population of which is in part ultra-selected nationwide among people who are better than average for health and income by idiosyncratic factors linked to work in government?
this been proven by many studies.
all immigrants that come in the US gets bigger the more they try to follow americans diet.
it got nothing to do with race.
u get fat if u constantly eat garbage food regardless of race.
this been proven by many studies.
all immigrants that come in the US gets bigger the more they try to follow americans diet.
it got nothing to do with race.
u get fat if u constantly eat garbage food regardless of race.
they get bigger vs their home country: yes.
some races still get bigger than others: also true.
if it has nothing to do with race how the ****ing hell do you explain Asians being far far far less often obese than anyone else?
they get bigger vs their home country: yes.
some races still get bigger than others: also true.
if it has nothing to do with race how the ****ing hell do you explain Asians being far far far less often obese than anyone else?
because the food they eat ?
the number of soup they eat compare to north america is vastly more important for example.
i mean are u pretending amercian food and diet is great in general ?
They consume fewer burgers and pizzas per capita?
jfc the answers are culture and environment, NOT RACE.
good lord. Racists gonna racist
racist? pointing out the lists you made can be superimposed with percentage of white residents in those states is a fact.
blacks are more obese than whites btw (it's actually black women being far more obese)
ofc they have far worse health outcomes than everyone else as everyone knows so where you have more blacks and natives life expectancy in the state is lower and every other healthcare variable is worse just because of that.
the derangement of leftists here calling RACIST an uncontroversial cla
My problem is, I don't know how to get to the bridge, to get you to understand, that there's no chart or data that can show one race is superior to the other. It doesn't exist. And to judge people first, because of their color of their skin, or culture, is extremely [fill in the blank].
Environment and economic opportunity supersede anything to do w/ race. You're only seeing that as some kind of proof in your mind, because you want to.
Why you want to... I'll let God and 2+2 judge you for that.
because the food they eat ?
the number of soup they eat compare to north america is vastly more important for example.
i mean are u pretending amercian food and diet is great in general ?
Americans eat **** a lot , more than most other first world countries.
asian adopted by non asian families don't become as obese as them
lol you want to deny that having more blacks and less Asians automatically raises your obesity rate a lot as a state.
it's fine, I don't expect numeracy from you.
the "more black people than whites" "state would the DC that isn't a state? and the population of which is in part ultra-selected nationwide among people who are better than average for health and income by idiosyncratic factors linked to work in government?
What I want is for you to look at a data set and be able to decipher if it supports your claims or not and be objective when the data throws a pie in your face
Doubly so after making a nutty race science post
