Israel/Palestine thread
Think this merits its own thread...
Discuss my fellow 2+2ers..
AM YISRAEL CHAI.
[QUOTE=Crossnerd]Edit: RULES FOR THIS THREAD
Posting guidelines for Politics and Soci...
These are our baselines. We're not reinventing the wheel here. If you aren't sure if something is acceptable to post, its better to ask first. If you think someone is posting something that violates the above guidelines, please report it or PM me rather than responding in kind.
To reiterate some of the points:
1. No personal attacks. This is a broad instruction, but, in general, we want to focus on attacking an argument rather than the poster making it. It is fine to say a post is antisemitic; it is not okay to call someone an antisemite over and over. If you believe someone is making antisemitic posts, report them or PM me. The same goes for calling people "baby killers" and "genocide lovers". You are allowed to argue that an action supports genocide or that the consequences of certain policies results in the death of children, but we are no longer going to be speaking to one another's intentions. It is not productive to the conversation and doesn't further any debate.
2. Racist posts and other bigoted statements that target a particular group or individuals of such groups with derogatory comments are not allowed. This should not need further explanation.
3. Graphic Images need to be in spoilers with a trigger warning.
4. Wishing Harm on other posters will result in an immediate timeout.
5. Genocidal statements such as "Kill 'em all" etc, are no longer permissible in the thread.
If anyone has any questions about the above, please PM me. I don't want a discussion about the rules to derail the content of this thread. If anything needs clarifying, I will do that in this thread.
Please be aware this thread is strictly moderated[/quote]
32538 Replies
Yeah, I would say anyone who wants to murder someone for spay painting "free Gaza" on the side of a building, is a fascist.
aside from the fact that some of those are centuries-old buildings with incalculable moral and economic value, letting them spray painting without repercussions leads to worse violence.
In fact they didn't limit themselves to spray, the made it unsafe to walk around which is indeed one of the worst possible things you can do with communal, public property.
You have to be willing to use a lot of violence so you don't need to use it: if they credibly know police will shoot to kill if they spray, you don't spray and nobody gets hurt.
0 tolerance not only works, is the only way to have safe public areas.
aside from the fact that some of those are centuries-old buildings with incalculable moral and economic value, letting them spray painting without repercussions leads to worse violence.
Well if spray painting an old building makes you upset, hopefully you can understand why dropping JDAMS on thousands of buildings with incalculable moral and economic value makes me upset.
Israel destroyed the Church Dun. but I guess so long as its not a synagogue, then its fine. whats the word for that double standard?
Israel destroyed the Church Dun. but I guess so long as its not a synagogue, then its fine. whats the word for that double standard?
It is a ruin that was recently rebuilt (finished in 2022). And it can be rebuilt again as soon as Hamas gives back the hostages, Gaza is demilitarized, and the international community can safely come back in and rebuild.
Hamas has offered the hostages back from day 1 and agreed to numerous cease fire terms. Israel would prefer to exterminate them and steal their land.
well, me and all of Israeli media...
Hamas has offered the hostages back from day 1 and agreed to numerous cease fire terms. Israel would prefer to exterminate them and steal their land.
For how closely you've followed this topic for over a year and all of your posting on it, if this is how you understand the situation that's a pretty epic fail.
should probably call up Times of Israel and tell them they got it all wrong
I get some exposure to Sachs on X even if i vehemently oppose his takes, i guess that's because a lot of the people i follow discuss him (many against him, some in favor, because i follow people i mostly disagree with as well, as you have to keep enemies close).
Afaik he previously was a very important "neocon" economist, so with fairly agreeable ideas, but when neocon (which we could define as technocratic center-right) ideas went out of fashion he slowly pivoted toward "pro-anti-west sentiment"
Not to unconditionally support Sach's pro Russia and China propagandism; there is some political expediency to blaming everything wrong in the world on Netanyahu. As Israel is a democracy and Netanyahu is old on top of this, I can see the logic of blaming everything on him and then "turning the page and starting out fresh" when he is gone.
Pretty much everyone Western Civlization is fighting are authoritarian dictatorships that have no hope for any type of reform or growth or turning the page. That being said, because these groups are the main problem and wont grow or reform or ideally go away entirely; there is little hope for things actually getting better.
The Sach's of the world can blame everything on Netanyahu as much as they please. But because this isn't actually the case, so when he is gone all the underlying problems will remain.
Hamas has offered the hostages back from day 1 and agreed to numerous cease fire terms. Israel would prefer to exterminate them and steal their land.
Hamas kills 1200 people and takes a couple hundred hostages and then say's "sorry! sorry! sorry!" when they realize what's coming and that's the team you are supporting?
youre changing the topic. I am just disputing that any of this would have been avoided by giving back the "hostages". Israel was going to do genocide regardless bc that is what happens when a population is taught to hate.
Maybe not directly related but interesting to note that the Jews are now being blamed for the impending TikTok ban in the US.
A desire to suppress on the ground videos from Gaza is being cited as the reason the US government is going after TikTok.
Lmao Victor still going on about his hostage theory that no one with a working brain will touch.
Only on terms that Israel could not accept in the circumstances, the circumstances being that Hamas had just committed a major and frankly disgusting act of war against Israel. If the Hamas leadership were stupid enough to think that Israel would do the usual 100-plus-for-1 release of prisoners, they were very stupid indeed.
Maybe not directly related but interesting to note that the Jews are now being blamed for the impending TikTok ban in the US.
A desire to suppress on the ground videos from Gaza is being cited as the reason the US government is going after TikTok.
Lmao Victor still going on about his hostage theory that no one with a working brain will touch.
it was literally reported in all of Israeli media, including far right media. the lead hostage liaison literally said it after he resigned.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0465a/0465a73da8515a44b52dc982d3cef1c420b3bdb9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5363/d536303589bfde66db03b8b15419be9c9cbeabc1" alt=""
https://www.timesofisrael.com/no-doubt-n...
Only on terms that Israel could not accept in the circumstances, the circumstances being that Hamas had just committed a major and frankly disgusting act of war against Israel. If the Hamas leadership were stupid enough to think that Israel would do the usual 100-plus-for-1 release of prisoners, they were very stupid indeed.
see above, they were going to give up the actual civilian hostages without any return swap.
and yes, I agree that Israel could not accept the terms bc Israel's goal is to exterminate the Palestinians.
it was literally reported in all of Israeli media, including far right media. the lead hostage liaison literally said it after he resigned.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/no-doubt-n...
see above, they were going to give up the actual civilian hostages without any return swap.
and yes, I agree that Israel could not accept the terms bc Israel's goal is to exterminate the Palestinians.
So Hamas wasn’t offering to release the hostages as part of any sort of good faith offer. Glad were on the same page.
I’ll read the article later, am I going to find any important tidbits you left out?
i think the most likely explanation is that sinwar and friends calculated that sending a few thousand hamas kids to their death in exchange for a few dead israeli civilians and a hostage or two would improve their position, and they had no idea that their rape and murder party could be so 'successful'
now they are all dead oops
So Hamas wasn’t offering to release the hostages as part of any sort of good faith offer. Glad were on the same page.
I’ll read the article later, am I going to find any important tidbits you left out?
not sure how that isnt good faith. seems as straightforward as possible.
remember how this discussion started: multiple people said that if Hamas would just #giveUpTheHostages that Israel would stop doing mass murder. I posit that their assertion makes no sense considering Hamas did in fact over to #giveUpTheHostages on like day 3.
i think the most likely explanation is that sinwar and friends calculated that sending a few thousand hamas kids to their death in exchange for a few dead israeli civilians and a hostage or two would improve their position, and they had no idea that their rape and murder party could be so 'successful'
now they are all dead oops
speaking of rape...even the Israeli prosecutor who wants to murder anyone who ate a single avocado on Oct 7th admitted there was no rape. so I guess you can drop that one from your atrocity propaganda. and yes, I am indeed the type to say "I told you so".
sounds like you might have some sort of mental block over the confirmed rapes which hamas committed on oct 7, along with the murders and kidnappings and all the rest of it
not sure how that isnt good faith. seems as straightforward as possible.
remember how this discussion started: multiple people said that if Hamas would just #giveUpTheHostages that Israel would stop doing mass murder. I posit that their assertion makes no sense considering Hamas did in fact over to #giveUpTheHostages on like day 3.
Obviously Israel would need assurance that after the hostages were returned and they pull out of Gaza, Hamas wouldn’t just reattempt Al Asqa. And we all know Hamas is not willing or capable of making these assurances.
You’re not stupid, so you already knew that this was the important piece of information that you’re intentionally leaving out or ignoring.
There’s a reason you’re the only person clinging to this. It’s illogical but you’re too far down to admit it at this point.
So when people say "just give back the hostages", you agree that it's bullshit. Glad we agree.