Trump 2nd term prediction thread
So, looks like Trump not only smashed the electoral college, but is looking on track to win the popular vote, which seems to be an unexpected turn of events, but a clear sign of the current temperature in the country and perhaps the wider world.
Would be interested to hear views on how his 2nd term will pan out from both sides of the aisle - major happenings, what he's going to get done, what he's not going to get done, the impact of his election on the current conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, whether his popularity will remain the same, wane, or increase, etc.
A bit of an anemic OP, I know, just interested to hear people's thoughts now that the election uncertainty is over.
I was wondering if you knew. The reality is, they count results. So, for example, if you are only hiring 30% women - regardless on your applicant pool - your DEI program is not working correctly. So it ends up being a quota system by default.
I do know. I would like to see you support your claim with empirical evidence. Keep in mind that poor implementation of an idea does not mean the idea is poor. These practices are meant to help curb the OBVIOUS systemic racism in place, so it is not a simple solution, nor a perfect one. However, it is a NECESSARY attempt. Decrying this without also decrying the state before this is, at best, absolutely indicative of ignorance, and most likely rooted in racism itself.
"Most effective DEI programs use racial data to identify discriminatory barriers that are compromising fairness and meritocracy in the workplace, and to develop initiatives that remove those barriers for everyone.
For example, if an analysis using racial data uncovers disproportionate barriers for Black, Asian, Latine, and Indigenous manager candidates due to the lack of a standard promotions process and high barriers to entry for candidates, a DEI initiative might follow up by working with all leaders to develop a standardized promotions process, train leaders on how to use it and how to interrupt biases, and automatically consider all employees for promotion after three years in a position. These initiatives would have the added benefit of reducing manager favoritism, nepotism, and other unethical practices that might negatively impact workers from any background. Most DEI initiatives follow this pattern: They collect data on marginalized groups to design workplaces that work better for everyone."
Stop pants wetting and let the democratically elected government get on with what it promised and was elected to do.
That would be my advice.
If you don't like it select better candidates next time and vote them out of office.
That's how democracy works.
It's astonishing the amount of crap trump has done in less than a month but the pearl clutching is getting next level.
Most effective DEI programs use racial data to identify discriminatory barriers that are compromising fairness and meritocracy in the workplace, and to develop initiatives that remove those barriers for everyone.
How do you think those barriers are identified? I would be interested in knowing how you could do it without counting results.
How do you think those barriers are identified? I would be interested in knowing how you could do it without counting results.
Did I say it was done without counting the results? I actually explicitly said how to use those results. What I said was that it doesn't just become a quota system by default. It certainly can, but that is not a proper implementation of the concept.
For example, if an analysis using racial data uncovers disproportionate barriers for Black, Asian, Latine, and Indigenous manager candidates due to the lack of a standard promotions process and high barriers to entry for candidates, a DEI initiative might follow up by working with all leaders to develop a standardized promotions process, train leaders on how to use it and how to interrupt biases, and automatically consider all employees for promotion after three years in a position. These initiatives would have the added benefit of reducing manager favoritism, nepotism, and other unethical practices that might negatively impact workers from any background. Most DEI initiatives follow this pattern: They collect data on marginalized groups to design workplaces that work better for everyone."
How do you think a manager would react to being told "you don't hire enough people from Pittsburgh, you'll need to go through training until you get it right"? I'll give you the answer, they'll hire more people from Pittsburgh until they are not being flagged anymore.
How do you think a manager would react to being told "you don't hire enough people from Pittsburgh, you'll need to go through training until you get it right"? I'll give you the answer, they'll hire more people from Pittsburgh until they are not being flagged anymore.
I'm glad you are here to tell us how you would implement this. I'll reiterate: a poor implementation of an idea does not mean the idea is poor. I would hope you would do better, because the guidelines are pretty explicit about how to handle that. It also lists the benefits of this. Competent leaders would be able to handle this.
Do you have any suggestions or do you think let's just go back to the overt racism of the past is the solution?
From what you wrote it doesn’t like the study you quoted actually answers the question of what percentage each variable accounts for in determining why a race has higher unemployment than other races. Is that correct? If so, I’m not sure why you responded to me using that study since we are in agreement that HR racism is a problem.
Again, I’m not saying racism isn’t a contributing factor. I’m asking what percentage of the differences in employment between races can be the fault of racism AND of those variables we list under racism what % is because of HR racism as opposed to racism somewhere before the hiring point.
From what you wrote it doesn’t like the study you quoted actually answers the question of what percentage each variable accounts for in determining why a race has higher unemployment than other races. Is that correct? If so, I’m not sure why you responded to me using that study since we are in agreement that HR racism is a problem.
Again, I’m not saying racism isn’t a contributing factor. I’m asking what percentage of the differences in employment between races can be the fault of racism AND of
You are free to research this topic that you are obviously interested in but has nothing to do with what I was talking about on your own if you'd like.
I apologize. I incorrectly thought you were interested in actually fixing the unemployment gap in races.
No need to apologize. I should apologize. I didn't think your brain was so damaged that you thought your question somehow was leading to a solution. I had no idea that you were so misguided that you believed an exact percentage was required in order to do anything at all.
Carry on. Let us know how you do without my help counting!
No need to apologize. I should apologize. I didn't think your brain was so damaged that you thought your question somehow was leading to a solution. I had no idea that you were so misguided that you believed an exact percentage was required in order to do anything at all.
Carry on. Let us know how you do without my help counting!
Knowing why a problem occurs doesn't fix the problem - it just allows you to know what you need to do to fix it. It seems odd you are interested in fixing the problem, but you don't like the idea of finding out why the problem occurs.
It would be like if you got either the flu or covid every other week - your solution would be to get take a flu shot and the covid vax every two weeks when you felt sick. I would want to figure out why you are getting sick so much more often than anyone else and then I would tell you to take the shots and also stop making out with strippers during flu season.
I'm sorry you felt the need to insult my intelligence.
I predict the pope will pass on Friday at 8:14 local time
Knowing why a problem occurs doesn't fix the problem - it just allows you to know what you need to do to fix it. It seems odd you are interested in fixing the problem, but you don't like the idea of finding out why the problem occurs.
I told you why the problem occurs. You decided it didn't count unless you knew the exact number. Have fun.
You don't need help doing that.
I told you why the problem occurs. You decided it didn't count unless you knew the exact number. Have fun.
You said the reason there is a gap in the unemployment of difference races is because of racist HR people. You can't honestly believe that is even 70% of the reason for the gap, can you?
pass
I was wondering if you knew. The reality is, they count results. So, for example, if you are only hiring 30% women - regardless on your applicant pool - your DEI program is not working correctly. So it ends up being a quota system by default.
Every DEI program works this way? Do you have a source?
Saying 100% of the wage gap is because of racism is beyond silly. Somehow you managed to sound smarter when you were personally attacking someone because you disagreed with them than posting this.
And this is why I don't bother engaging with you. It's not silly. It's the entire problem. You're simply making up excuses so you don't have to address racism because you benefit from it.