Joe Rogan
As an aside the way the sharks are now circling for Rogan, I find despicable but also template.
I think it is exactly why many on the right have learned you never apologize as that leads to a feeding frenzy, on the left to try and end you. It is what they call the left eating their own, and yes, Joe Rogan is a lefty even if you believe he is left who says wrong things and lacks polish.
In the very segment I am watching on CNN as i type this Jim Costa keeps saying "Joe Rogen was caught repeatedly saying the 'N-Word' when Jim is doing the same thing. Rogen just thought hiding behind saying the 'N-Word' instead of saying the actual word was not productive or silly.
So Costa says 'that guy just the said N-word' and every one says, that is fine to say.
Rogan says 'That guy just said n*&^er' and they say that is wrong to say and worse they cut the reply of that quote so tight you only hear the word said without context so you will assume he was using it despairingly when he was not.
And I am not saying Rogan has never, in all his years of making long form public statements said anything that does not sound off or bad as he has and has admitted it. But anyone who has listened to much of his comment and context over the years would never assume he was anything but a lefty. this idea of him being a righty only really took root as he was in opposition to much of the science around covid and some people believe being so then requires you be put on sides.
This election is America's last chance to keep democracy. How does he say this with a straight face.
Democrats basically say that every election lol.
Anyway the republicans have a point about that, not technically about "democracy", but about avoiding permanent mono-party rule.
If one party transparently wants to take in many millions people from outside and give them the right to vote, and the country is otherwise 50-50, then letting the other party win means GG-NORE for future elections, in terms of chances of winning for the party that disagreed with taking in many millions new voters.
Is the above controversial?
is there a social net for illegals immigrants i dont know about ?
arent they working ?
In the USA illegals with kids born elsewhere (so not citizens), will be allowed to send them to school anyway (and that costs 15k+/year per pupil on avg in the USA).
In the USA illegals can use the ER at taxpayers/insured people expenses.
Then if illegals have a child, that's a US citizen so welfare kicks in for the household.
But for "asylum seekers" there are additional forms of welfare (housing and so on). And if they are accepted as a refugee they get welfare.
In the USA illegals with kids born elsewhere (so not citizens), will be allowed to send them to school anyway (and that costs 15k+/year per pupil on avg in the USA).
In the USA illegals can use the ER at taxpayers/insured people expenses.
Then if illegals have a child, that's a US citizen so welfare kicks in for the household.
But for "asylum seekers" there are additional forms of welfare (housing and so on). And if they are accepted as a refugee they get welfare.
Strange .
They are illegals but not afraid of being caught and deported so they can send kids to schools and go to the ER no problem ?
Strange .
They are illegals but not afraid of being caught and deported so they can send kids to schools and go to the ER no problem ?
Yes exactly: because they don't get deported thanks to democrats.
They don't get asked ID to get to the ER (i mean they do, but they don't provide any and get serviced anyway).
Man illegals get hired, rent houses and so on, there is a complete disregard of the rule of law in many areas, basically all the democrat led ones + some of the purple ones as well.
Most cities have democrat representatives and they do not enforce laws against illegals.
Good point
Anyway the republicans have a point about that, not technically about "democracy", but about avoiding permanent mono-party rule.
If one party transparently wants to take in many millions people from outside and give them the right to vote, and the country is otherwise 50-50, then letting the other party win means GG-NORE for future elections, in terms of chances of winning for the party that disagreed with taking in many millions new voters.
Is the above controversial?
I'd say the republicans should stop crying and figure out how to win votes from all new voters, born domestically or abroad.
Good point
I'd say the republicans should stop crying and figure out how to win votes from all new voters, born domestically or abroad.
So republicans have to figure out how to win the votes of people who are currently not-citizens, because democrats might expand the franchise in unlimited way toward people they select on purpose sharing democrat political preferences, and that's not an actual threat to democracy for current american citizens?
Imagine republicans having a plan to give citizenship to 30m indians who can prove a solid traditional rightwing attitude.
Would your answer for democrats be "well, toughen up and try to win the votes of your future fellow trad hindus"?
This election is America's last chance to keep democracy. How does he say this with a straight face.
Yet the other side believes this if Trump wins . Their argument would be Kamala wants to eliminate the filibuster and grant all the illegals permanent status so they can vote democrats and pack the Supreme Court by increasing it and Joe Biden ignores Supreme Court rulings with student loan debt forgiveness
I personally think democracy will survive no matter who wins .
Hopefully we can put to rest the Rogan is actually a leftist Bernie Bro nonsense.
Rogan is a non college educated white bro who believes boomer faebook memes and passes them off as personal anecdotes. He's a core Trumper.
He absolutely used to be a Bernie bro, but covid broke his brain.
He just looks, sounds, and most importantly, FEELS different than he did before 2021
He absolutely used to be a Bernie bro, but covid broke his brain.
He just looks, sounds, and most importantly, FEELS different than he did before 2021
He's not alone. One of my best friends loves Bernie, and even though he decided to not vote this election, he'd rather see Trump win. The modern left is largely responsible for his popularity.
So republicans have to figure out how to win the votes of people who are currently not-citizens, because democrats might expand the franchise in unlimited way toward people they select on purpose sharing democrat political preferences, and that's not an actual threat to democracy for current american citizens?
Imagine republicans having a plan to give citizenship to 30m indians who can prove a solid traditional rightwing attitude.
Would your answer for democrats be "well, toughen up and try to wi
A. For now it's just a conspiracy theory as far as I'm concerned.
B. Bro, politics are dirty. What was it, like two years the republicans stopped any any Obama appointments? It's the democrat's job to figure out ways to counter republican petty tactics.
I know you think it's a good thing to grind government to a halt but republicans are being babies with their refusal to govern.
He absolutely used to be a Bernie bro, but covid broke his brain.
He just looks, sounds, and most importantly, FEELS different than he did before 2021
He's not alone. One of my best friends loves Bernie, and even though he decided to not vote this election, he'd rather see Trump win. The modern left is largely responsible for his popularity.
I'm wondering if some of the authoritarianism that happened during covid times turned off some of the hippie types?
A. For now it's just a conspiracy theory as far as I'm concerned.
B. Bro, politics are dirty. What was it, like two years the republicans stopped any any Obama appointments? It's the democrat's job to figure out ways to counter republican petty tactics.
I know you think it's a good thing to grind government to a halt but republicans are being babies with their refusal to govern.
It's a conspiracy theory that democrats transparently claim they want to put all illegals on a "citizenship path"? they alread did as much as they could in the past. Every executive decision that prolongs an illegal staying in the USA increases the chances an anchor baby is made
I'm wondering if some of the authoritarianism that happened during covid times turned off some of the hippie types?
The republican party has made an effort to recruit uneducated white dumb dude bros. Other than religious nutters, it's one of their biggest targets and it's largely happened pro Trump. Even people like Meygyn Kelly were complaining about how it might be turning off larger persuadable groups like moderate suburban women.
It's a conspiracy theory that democrats transparently claim they want to put all illegals on a "citizenship path"? they alread did as much as they could in the past. Every executive decision that prolongs an illegal staying in the USA increases the chances an anchor baby is made
Maybe it's not a big voting conspiracy and we just need more cheap labor to keep the money printing ponzi afloat.
Edit: someone needs to pay my social security benefits.
Maybe it's not a big voting conspiracy and we just need more cheap labor to keep the money printing ponzi afloat.
Edit: someone needs to pay my social security benefits.
If that was the case the dems would be pushing for better immigration laws wrt working visas and so on (which is whay Bill Gates and many others have been asking for like 20+ years). They don't, even the border bill didn't even attempt to fix that.
They instead extend stay in the USA to people that are never filtered for their participation in the US economy in any way, and they send them to areas of the country which are purple more often than random.
