The "LOLCANADA" thread...again

The reality is most voters will see through this. Though there is one cut that voters will embrace and that is Axe the Tax

That could put over a $1000 back in my pocket every year .

He ran on securing the border in 2016 as well. He didn’t do it, obviously. So what makes you think he’ll do it this time around? (Hint: He won’t. If you think he will, your brain is broken.)

Name a president that has more votes?

Any chance you are going to elaborate on your list?

didnt Joe Biden get the most votes in 2020

Yes he did and he's already started again. If you don't think illegal border crossings were lower his first term and are going to be lower the next 4 years (your brain is broken).

No, he didn’t. If he built a big beautiful wall that Mexico paid for, there would be evidence of it. There ain’t.

Trump and the GOP have zero interest in solving the border issue, as it’s the perfect fear-mongering tool to use on the droolers in the GOP. And it worked. Trump got elected on the back of those misguided fears. But he doesn’t give two ****s about the border. And he never did.

Lol ok 😵

Glad you get it now.

Now how are we going to get you to understand that Trump getting 200M+ votes doesn’t make him the most popular POTUS ever? That may be a bridge too far. After all, one cannot make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.

Even though I do not think his win was the biggest in terms of the popular vote I would call it the greatest comeback victory by any president. I thought he was a lock after the assassination attempt but than the debate happened and it was downhill from there .

His victory was historic as he picked up votes in every county but one I dop believe and up against a war chest over 1 billion $ by Kamala

Its funny as you think there is tiers of stupidity on the right I think Shifty and I would agree on the same as the left . I put you on the Upper Tier .

It also was historic because never before has the majority of US voters voted for someone convicted by a jury of their peers of multiple counts of felonious activity.

The rule of law obviously doesn’t mean **** to these people. This is also likely historic; that over 1/2 the voters don’t give a **** about a criminal, who all but the most deranged concede is a total shitbag of a human, holding what is arguably the most powerful position in the world.

Both prosecutions were political and the one had no victims and the other he paid off a porn star. People saw through these political prosecutions . If they wanted to go after him for a real crime it should have been when he defrauded all those folks at Trump University. The voters didn't care and the Democrats picked the worst candidate possible. Un til the Dems start pandering to the Ukes of Society they are going no were

Even if the prosecutions were “politically motivated”, which is impossible to prove, the verdicts weren’t. The mother****er was guilty of what he was charged with, and you KNOW it.
The jury weighed the evidence (that voters likely never saw) and convicted his guilty ass. That’s how our system is supposed to work. Obviously TeamIdiot doesn’t care, and they are now in charge.

He should have been tried for treason given his actions leading up to the riots on Jan6. But again, Team****** is now in charge. With these folks, who are PROUD of their ignorance and stupidity, in charge America is ****ed.

Could be worse you could be living in Canada with Trudeau as your leader

There are multiple other threads you can spew your nonsense in.

So you're not going to elaborate on your easily googleable list?

**** off, ******.

Team DogShitLoser FTW!

Which of those things is confusing to you?

You hilariously and like adorably pathetically said your buddy Trump was the "most popular in history", but like....no. Nope. Your side won, not sure why you are dishing out the copium here.

Ok I have a prediction based on the GST manouvering. I think that Poilievre when he FINALLY releases his election platform is going to only add something quite small on the tax cut side. I'd initially guess that there will be something bigger. Like significant income tax cuts or business tax cuts or permanent gst tax cut or something.

However, the tax cuts we have right now are
1) carbon tax
2) gst on new home builds under a million.

But here is the thing. BOTH of those tax cuts are revenue neutral. Costs the government nothing to implement them. The second would be expensive, but poilievre is cancelling billions from housing funds to pay for it so also more or less neutral. It's just a debate of general cuts (i.e. people who would build anyway getting a discount) vs targetted cuts (hoping to incentivize people on the margin to build and to change municipal laws).

So on the one side, the argument that Poilievre is holding out on a big promise is that he hasn't promised anything at all that actually costs the government money, so there is room for him to do so. But I am leaning towards the argument that he never is going to. That he thinks he can win (and certainly that is true right now) without promising much of anything. If you care about bringing down the deficit, that is the way to go. If you think that this is going to make life more affordable to the average person right now, it isn't going to do much of anything, just swapping out two revenue neutral things.

Pretend all of them confuse me.

Most votes for President=most popular President. Pretty simple. Not sure why that triggers people so much, you can try and argue it or say it's not true but you're just wasting your energy.

Hey lozen you build houses right ?

If u sell a house listed at 6000 square foot while it’s end up being a 2000 square foot , you think in front of a judge claiming it’s a political witch hunt would be a good defence and not actual fraud ?

If you say yes , please never sale me a house , you’re a crook ….

https://www.propublica.org/article/trump...

Did trump had more votes then Biden ?
Trump won by an incredible thin margin on the popular vote right ?
So Kamala is the second most popular president candidate ever following your logic ?
I don’t know how math works but 81 usually is a higher number then 78 shrug .
But I get how you think polievre makes sense when he talk about money with maths like that ….

Ps: most popular do not translate into most efficient either , but will found out soon enough how long that honeymoon will last with voters I suppose .

Incorrect. Most votes for President = most votes for President. Nothing more. Trump loves the uneducated for a reason; they’re easily fooled. Like this guy.