Trump 2nd term prediction thread
So, looks like Trump not only smashed the electoral college, but is looking on track to win the popular vote, which seems to be an unexpected turn of events, but a clear sign of the current temperature in the country and perhaps the wider world.
Would be interested to hear views on how his 2nd term will pan out from both sides of the aisle - major happenings, what he's going to get done, what he's not going to get done, the impact of his election on the current conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, whether his popularity will remain the same, wane, or increase, etc.
A bit of an anemic OP, I know, just interested to hear people's thoughts now that the election uncertainty is over.
Will you be joining the military to help overtake those areas, or are you too much of a pussy to put your ass where your convictions are?
Sort of a non-sequitor. Someone can believe that something will happen without any desire themselves to make that thing happen.
Person A: Everyone is going to die someday
Person B: Why don't you kill everyone then, pussy.
There will be no military actions to conquer new states or territories.
They will be done via negotiation.
Greenland/Denmark may agree to something.
Canada is not agreeing to anything. This will not happen.
Panama Canal a little more interesting. Legal language could lead one to believe US should control it.
Will you be joining the military to help overtake those areas, or are you too much of a pussy to put your ass where your convictions are?
What areas? I don't have a clue what you're talking about. Are you saying I'm a pussy, because I should go to war and fight the Canadian military to take over their country?
I said "the 51st state" meaning if there ever was another state, it would be Canada. I'm not saying it's a closed deal, even though I know some ppl who do think that. Who gives a ****? Is that what got you all butthurt?
If you're referring to taking over Canada by force, the president never alluded to any of that. Take off your tinfoil hat, these are baseless conspiracy theory claims.
President Trump isn't an idiot like you and all the other clueless trolls seem to be. When asked by a reporter if he would rule something out while talking about the relationship between two countries, why on earth would he tell them yes or no, no matter what it is, and give our enemies free information they could use against us?
He was asked by a reporter if he would ever rule out using congress or the military in some way and he gave his standard, strategic answer which he's always done throughout his political career, which was "No, I wouldn't rule anything out". He didn't threaten to take over another country, so relax, chill out and stop believing in these baseless claims and conspiracy theories such as "he's hitler and a threat to democracy" which is actually being said by the people who are hitler and a threat to democracy.
Nothing more Republican than trying to add a welfare state to the country. Has anyone even looked into the economy of Greenland?
Hilarious that we have a trade deficit with Canada that Trump thinks is a subsidy and Greenland literally exists because of subsidy
The areas you listed in the post I quoted of yours. Wtf?
I don't have a clue what you're talking about. Are you saying I'm a pussy, because I should go to war and fight the Canadian military to take over their country?
I said "the 51st state" meaning if there ever was another state, it would be Canada. I'm not saying it's a closed deal, even though I know some ppl who do think that. Who gives a ****? Is that what got you all butthurt?
If you're referring to taking over Canada by force, the president never alluded to any of that. Take off your tinfoil
Didn't you post a video of Trump saying that military coercion is not off the table?
President Trump isn't an idiot like you and all the other clueless trolls seem to be. When asked by a reporter if he would rule something out while talking about the relationship between two countries, why on earth would he tell them yes or no, no matter what it is, and give our enemies free information they could use against us?
There is no need to say you don't rule out military coercion when it's not an area of conflict. What enemies are going to use that information against us and how?
He was asked by a reporter if he would ever rule out using congress or the military in some way and he gave his standard, strategic answer which he's always done throughout his political career, which was "No, I wouldn't rule anything out".
Against Greenland and Panama, not NK, Iran, etc. Maybe you should look up the word tacit. Words matter.
Lol @ "his standard answer" when he said that if Kim launches another missile they would see "fire and fury the likes of which the world has never seen before."
Then Kim responded by launching another missile and Trump did nothing just like the paper tiger Kim knew he is.
But anyway, I can see it's going to be four years of twisting yourself into a pretzel trying to justify everything Trump says/does.
I don't think Trump, Kim, anyone, will actually do anything like launching missiles or invade other countries, but they will threaten it, a lot, because it makes both look good: Kim looks good for picking a fight with the US, his public enemy, most powerful military in the world, and Trump looks good for dealing with Kim and keeping the peace, so it's profitable for the images of both to keep this game of appereance without anything actually happening.
