The "LOLCANADA" thread...again
So what's new?
I've noticed the Liberals are now ahead in all major polls and Trudeau hasn't even started to campaign yet...i'd be shocked if they lost the election now.
Just shows just how incompetent Conservatives are.
I know there is lots of frustration going on now with Trump, but the issue that tilts me the most is that he keeps whining about a trade deficit with Canada.
On every damn level you can think of it has to be the stupidest argument.
Instead, The US should be happy that they have a trading partner that is (1) geographically close, (2) has the resources they need, and (3) sells you stuff cheaper than you can get it elsewhere (because if you can get it cheaper elsewhere and are not buying it elsewher
Are you really trying to convince with reason unreasonable maga people ? 😀
Logic fails in some part of “Amurica”.
FWIW it takes some specials kind of stupid to believe exporting US dollar
( that you can create from thin air , which the US been doing a lot the past 2 decades -> QE)
to have real goods in return (importing) is a bad trade lol…
Giving fake piece of paper in return of real good and services seems great trade to me .
Not taking into account how having the reserve currency has massive advantage is pretty stupid .
But trump wants the cake and eat it too , like any monarch in history ….
The problem in the U.S. isn’t trades, it’s how the fiscal policies fack over so much the bottom 60% of the population , but they could never say it .
Especially when it’s trump that made the last trade agreement !
So Mark Carney will not repeal the no more pipeline bill so he has no intention to expand trade markets for oil
So he is Trumps puppet I guess that’s why Trump supports him
This is very badly framed .
I know you know but the planet isn’t in need of saving .
It will still be here even if we would drop hundred of nuclear bomb on it.
We actually trying to save ourself already , as in food chain, Place to live where it inst 45degrees , less climate disaster occurring, etc.
I for one welcome a word where i get to eat slop if i make it to 110
So Mark Carney will not repeal the no more pipeline bill so he has no intention to expand trade markets for oil
So he is Trumps puppet I guess that’s why Trump supports him
repealing bill c 69 would be moronic and would not help build pipelines anyways. There needs to be a framework in place for stakeholders...it's a legal and civil responsibility for the government. The point is that the processes themselves need to be improved to create certainties. And the government needs to get more behind encouraging and selling the projects that make sense.
The only ways forward is...forward.
So Mark Carney will not repeal the no more pipeline bill so he has no intention to expand trade markets for oil
So he is Trumps puppet I guess that’s why Trump supports him
Stop repeating poilievres lies.
Stop.
In the very interview in which he is asked about C69 he emphatically supports building pipelines and energy corridors. One can build pipelines AND have a meaningful environmental review. It’s a lie to suggest otherwise.
repealing bill c 69 would be moronic and would not help build pipelines anyways. There needs to be a framework in place for stakeholders...it's a legal and civil responsibility for the government. The point is that the processes themselves need to be improved to create certainties. And the government needs to get more behind encouraging and selling the projects that make sense.
The only ways forward is...forward.
Oh I agree and that is why he is proposing a fast track process for permits unlike the Liberal system to delay delay and delay till the companies get tired and invest in other countries
Stop repeating poilievres lies.
Stop.
In the very interview in which he is asked about C69 he emphatically supports building pipelines and energy corridors. One can build pipelines AND have a meaningful environmental review. It’s a lie to suggest otherwise.
Tell me how you build a pipeline if you have a law saying no new pipelines ?
Oh, it's simple. You just stop lying.
Stop.
Lying.
Stop.
Lying.
Just because Poilievre does it, doesn't mean you have to do it.
Stop.
Lying.
Stop.
Lying.
Bill C69 does not say "no new pipelines", and not anything remotely close to it.
Stop.
Lying.
The carbon tax was a total failure and a great analysis of why
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstori...
Filled up the truck today about $17.00 savings .
lmao. Lozen just egregiously lies, gets caught redhanded, and immediately tries to pretend it never happens and go WHATABOUTCARBONTAX.
Just utterly no shame for endless lying.
Stop.
Lying.
Now to be "fair" to lozen, it isn't that he comes up with his egregious lies. He just repeats the lies told to him. Here is a conservative MP doing incredibly deceptive editing and making the same C69=no new pipeliens lie.
Literally in that same Q&A session he confirms his supports for pipelines.
It's lies all the way down.
All lozen can do is to stop repeating them.
And save what little dignity he has left.
But I think he won't.
Stop.
Lying.
The carbon tax was a total failure and a great analysis of why
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstori...
Filled up the truck today about $17.00 savings .
Let’s see if there is no increases in the trending emission after this ?
That is what you saying right ?
Gas is cheap today, thanks Pierre!!!
+1
Oh, it's simple. You just stop lying.
Stop.
Lying.
Stop.
Lying.
Just because Poilievre does it, doesn't mean you have to do it.
Stop.
Lying.
Stop.
Lying.
Bill C69 does not say "no new pipelines", and not anything remotely close to it.
Stop.
Lying.
If I believe it’s true it’s not a lie is the argument you use for
Trudeau not planting a billion trees
Failure to provide clean drinking water
Election reform
………..
So increase in gaz emission will not affect climate changes ?
Brilliant …
Well being against a revenue neutral tax AND rebate scheme isn't going to accomplish that. It's largest effect on wealth is shifting wealth from poor people (net winners of the tax and rebate scheme) to rich people (net losers). But yes tell us more about how you saved money at the gas tank!
Well being against a revenue neutral tax AND rebate scheme isn't going to accomplish that. It's largest effect on wealth is shifting wealth from poor people (net winners of the tax and rebate scheme) to rich people (net losers). But yes tell us more about how you saved money at the gas tank!
I thought it was about climate change and not wealth redistribution
Another lie by you
Well, good, uncertain, and bad news on the tariffs.
-Good - could have been worse for Canada
-Uncertain - still not sure about the integrated, multi-national NA automobile and it parts, assembly, etc.
-Bad - Our biggest trading partner just created a recession for itself, so we shall probably suffer from that as well as the tariffs.
Congrats to the Orange Menace
Well being against a revenue neutral tax AND rebate scheme isn't going to accomplish that. It's largest effect on wealth is shifting wealth from poor people (net winners of the tax and rebate scheme) to rich people (net losers). But yes tell us more about how you saved money at the gas tank!
Ya, because that was obviously happening with record food bank use and record house hold debt under the carbon tax.
Canada has been on a decline even under Harper . Even if we increase our emissions it will have no effect on the overall climate issue as China and India are increasing at rates no one can deny
Hers the fact if Canada had zero emissions it would do nothing to the climate change problem as is the fact if they increased marginally.
