In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
I was pretty sure you didn't, but plenty on your political tribe do.
and given ecritude is constantly making fun of low IQ takes on the right, he should acknowledge the same on the left (which he won't because he is intellectually dishonest).
you are right and it will happen, because plenty of leftists are dumb as rocks
Do you think people on the left have more belief in the supernatural than those on the right? I would guess it's the other way around.
I’ve always wondered what the steps are in a manhunt like this one. Are they looking at every public and private video they can find and tracking the shooters movements for miles upon miles at a time? I’m sure they will find him eventually. There is really no way to commit a crime like this against a famous person and think you could get away with it in 2025
very balanced editorial choice on wiki yet again
Do you think people on the left have more belief in the supernatural than those on the right? I would guess it's the other way around.
in general women have significantly stronger actual beliefs in the supernatural than men (yes crossnerd that's very well established in literature) so now that women are overwelmingly voting left (at least in the USA), then yes.
You fool.
White nationalism is an expression and a set of beliefs. They aren’t describing him as white.
It's an expression about a set of beliefs that don't describe that person at all in the slightest, and that even if it did wouldn't be the first thing to say about him at all UNLESS you are SO biased that you think that specific set of beliefs is more important than all life accomplishments and everything else you could use to describe him.
It's an insane way to describe him *even if he was a white nationalist*, which he wasn't.
"founder of Turning point America" would be a normal way to describe him (in a world where dead people are usually associated to their biggest organizational/business contribution), same as you wouldn't describe Bill Gates as "friend of Epstein" as the specifier , would you?
Any time I see someone say 'you fool' it's in Gilbert Gottfried's voice
Of course he was a white nationalist. He even said that black people were better off in slavery and subjugation.
Of course he was a white nationalist. He even said that black people were better off in slavery and subjugation.
That's not being a white nationalist. Being a white nationalist requires you to hate on all other non white ethnicities as well, OBVIOUSLY?
anti-black is common among non whites (like hindus for ex, or Han chinese), not a synonim of white nat.
You’re not required to list each and every ethnicity you hate in order to be a white nationalist. The fact that he ranted about black peoples and Muslims, a predominantly darker skinned group, is more than enough.
Yep
The number of Americans filing for unemployment benefits for the week ending Sept. 6 rose by 27,000 to 263,000, the Labor Department reported Thursday. That’s the most applications since the week of Oct. 23, 2021 and well above the 231,000 new applications economists forecast. It’s also the biggest week-to-week increase in almost a year.
Meanwhile.......
For those keeping score, the difference now is a billion, which isn’t much given the size of the figures: Musk’s $384.2 billion versus $383.2 billion for Ellison.
Ummm......Bernie is right
You’re not required to list each and every ethnicity you hate in order to be a white nationalist. The fact that he ranted about black peoples and Muslims, a predominantly darker skinned group, is more than enough.
lol a catholic philipino can easily rant against black people and muslims, and that doesn't make him a white supremacist jfc.
You are a rapist of semantics regularly, and in this case, more than usual.
And again, even if he was a self identified white nationalist, that would still not something you would say as the main and only descriptor of that person unless you are a deranged leftist that considers political affiliation the single most important characteristic of every individual.
Well it helps if you’re actually white of course. Yes, a white westerner pouring hatred onto black people and Muslims because he considers them inferior is a white nationalist.
Sorry if being described in this way upsets you. I know how you like to pretend your bloodlust transcends mere racial lines but no one believes you.
Luciom, you seem to not realize how Wikipedia works. It's made by individuals and no one person is responsible for each article.
Things also change very quickly when things are settling after big news.
It appears that the article you posted doesn't even exist anymore under that title, which was probably only in existence for a few hours.
The "shooting" of Charlie Kirk article is now the "killing" of CK, and it no longer calls him a white nationalist, but a "right wing political activist".
Well it helps if you’re actually white of course. Yes, a white westerner pouring hatred onto black people and Muslims because he considers them inferior is a white nationalist.
Sorry if being described in this way upsets you. I know how you like to pretend your bloodlust transcends mere racial lines but no one believes you.
you just invent meanings to words and expressions like when you don't count a black rwandan son of refugees as an immigrant just because he was born in the UK.
If i like beef, lamb and goat and i hate pork and would kill people who eat fish, i am not a beef supremacist. I must love beef a lot more than every other single protein source by a large margin to be a beef supremacist.
Your deranged, violent side decided that "white nationalism" and "white supremacism" are death penalty crimes, and use that label to define every person who doesn't share your take on races not existing.
It's not that we can't talk with you. You decide not to be able to talk with anyone outside your violent hellhole.
Luciom, you seem to not realize how Wikipedia works. It's made by individuals and no one person is responsible for each article.Things also change very quickly when things are settling after big news.It appears that the article you posted doesn't even exist anymore under that title, which wax probably only on existence for a few hours.The "shooting" of Charlie Kirk article is n
yes i realize wikipedia is a" collective effort".
So, on one side it's good to see they fixed that. On the other, it's horrifying to know that the collective include people so pyschotic, so derangedly lefist, as to even attempt to describe him like that. And that our jalfrezi fully agreed with those psychotic takes of course.
poor lucy, still butt hurt
maybe get a job?
It means that exactly one person described him that way, and though that person may have been mistaken, you're way over the top saying that the person was deranged and psychotic because of that unemotional description.
If you want to see something posted online that really appears to be deranged and psychotic, President Trump posts comments online nearly every day which most people would consider to fit the bill.
you just invent meanings to words and expressions like when you don't count a black rwandan son of refugees as an immigrant just because he was born in the UK.
I mean, you’ve strung yourself up naked by your own testicles here.
Obviously someone born in the UK isn’t an immigrant, because the definition of immigration is moving to another country to live, thicko. He is the son of immigrants, which is totally different.
Charlie Kirk was objectively a white nationalist
This should be uncontroversial
If you find it controversial then maybe look into it
Then you need to think a little harder about it. What does the term mean to you at the moment?
Then you need to think a little harder about it. What does the term mean to you at the moment?
guys it's not complicated , you have to put whites a lot above every single other ethnicity. Or it's not white supremacy/nationalism.
If you are ok with whites/jews/eastern asians you are not a white supremacist even if you want to put every single other human being in an oven because you think he is "inferior" ok?
try to find other words to describe that, because they exist.
If you don't feel horrified and disgusted by Vance having children with an indian, and you aren't literally repelled by that and you don't consider him a blood traitor, you are not a white supremacist ok?
