The "LOLCANADA" thread...again
So what's new?
I've noticed the Liberals are now ahead in all major polls and Trudeau hasn't even started to campaign yet
LMAO. Buddy I just quoted you:
Lol aren't you a decades long nicotine user? ?
Nicotine and hand rolled cigars, yes..
Are you retracting your previous confirmation that that used nicotine products for decades? Of course it doesn't matter - it's just as hypocritical to be all mad at red whine while being furious that corners stores aren't able to sell child friendly bubblegum flavoured nicotine regardless of how long this has been your personal drug of choice. It's just hilarious that you can't even keep your story straight.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tim-hor...
Don't go to **** Hortons anyways but if I ever needed an extra reason to boycott, this is it. Imagine lobbying for more foreign temp workers when Canada has the unemployment numbers it has.
Miller said he is not unsympathetic to that request but "it's part of a larger discussion on how to manage the inflow and outflow."
The most overpaid useless politician ever. How this man once again is back I do not know.
lmao buddy obviously we are talking about your silly rant about how evil the Big Government was for banning the sale of various nicotine products in convenience stores. Don't you remember? Which like was a semi-reasonable position one could debate until you accidentally revealed your hypocrisy and started calling for the Big Government to ban alcohol. Now we just laugh at you.
Shifty is a useless person so agreeing with him hurts my soul but I'd be okay with the government banning everything that's harmful for people. Take highly processed foods of the shelves too. Ban social media for kids. Get rid of ****ing vapes.
NO not at all I always give an honest opinion its just many of you do not like it as this board leans heavily left. I also admit when I am wrong or make a mistake and apologize when a comment crosses the line
Sadly many here do not
LMAO. Buddy I just quoted you:Are you retracting your previous confirmation that that used nicotine products for decades? Of course it doesn't matter - it's just as hypocritical to be all mad at red whine while being furious that corners stores aren't able to sell child friendly bubblegum flavoured nicotine regardless of how long this has been your personal drug of choice. It's
Lol buddy, you think I care and am lying? I chewed tobacco (tobacco product) when I was younger then stopped. A year or 2 ago I took a liking to nicotine pouches (nicotine product) and celebratory hand rolled cigar a couple times a year (tobacco product). That isn't "decades" of use.
Hypocritical would be you pretending there aren't different schedules of drugs and they are all the same. A serious person that doesn't have the mindset of a 12 year old would understand a lot of bad things happen to people under the influence of alcohol, not nicotine.
Shifty is a useless person so agreeing with him hurts my soul but I'd be okay with the government banning everything that's harmful for people. Take highly processed foods of the shelves too. Ban social media for kids. Get rid of ****ing vapes.
Ya that position is a bit silly but at least internally consistent. Shifties position however is to ban all the harmful **** other people take while think it is very "sad" if the government bans the harmful **** he likes.
Lol buddy, you think I care and am lying? I chewed tobacco (tobacco product) when I was younger then stopped. A year or 2 ago I took a liking to nicotine pouches (nicotine product) and celebratory hand rolled cigar a couple times a year (tobacco product). That isn't "decades" of use.
LMAO. Why then did you say this:
[QUOTE=uke]Lol aren't you a decades long nicotine user? ?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Shifty]Nicotine and hand rolled cigars, yes..[/QUOTE]
I just repeated precisely what you confirmed with the identical words and you are having this silly hissy fit that no no no no your nicotine addiction isn't decades long it was previously tobacco. Who cares, it doesn't change your hypocrisy, it's just hilarious you can't handle basic back and forth conversations.
I just repeated precisely what you confirmed with the identical words and you are having this silly hissy fit that no no no no your nicotine addiction isn't decades long it was previously tobacco. Who cares, it doesn't change your hypocrisy, it's just hilarious you can't handle basic back and forth conversations.
There is a difference between nicotine products and tobacco products silly.
I'm assuming you believe ALL drugs should either be legal or illegal? Nicotine has never been illegal, alcohol has and is involved in ~50% of crimes and costs 4+billion annually for Canadas criminal justice system. It's not at all hypocritical to think one should be legal while the other is illegal. Only a person with the mindset of a 12 year old would think that way.
LMAO why do you keep saying this? Nobody is confused. I asked if you used nicotine products for decades. You seemingly confirmed it. Now you are saying you didn't. I don't care, I'm just laughing that you can't follow a conversation and seem shocked - shocked - that I quoted the thing you already confirmed.
I'm assuming you believe ALL drugs should either be legal or illegal?
That's a stupid assumption. Clearly you don't believe this since you were moaning and complaining about how sad it was that the big government was stopping child friendly bubblegum flavoured nicotine pouches being easily sold at convenience stores while simultaneously blasting away at red wine. It's kinda funny because in principle we could probably find some partial common ground on this issue - I similarly think society consumes too much alcohol and would be better if we didn't - but you approach the entire conversation with just ludicrousness all we can really do at this stage is point and laugh.
ha.
hahaha.
ha.
If you were following BC politics the last couple days that was an absolutely fascinating internal coup were we spent the better of the day unbelievable not sure who actually was the leader of his majesties official opposition. But as of now, finally, Rustad has resigned.
One crazy detail: BC Cons were bringing in about 350k this quarter, at a rate of 200k spend per month and 100k raised per month. NDP brought in 9 million, paid off all election debts and building a war chest. The residential school denialism bothsidesism also stung. That and just horrific management means this ouster was kind of non-partisan and just focused on his shitty leadership.
There is a difference between nicotine products and tobacco products silly. I'm assuming you believe ALL drugs should either be legal or illegal? Nicotine has never been illegal, alcohol has and is involved in ~50% of crimes and costs 4+billion annually for Canadas criminal justice system. It's not at all hypocritical to think one should be legal while the other is illegal. Onl
How about weed and thc candy ?
Same distinction ?
If you were following BC politics the last couple days that was an absolutely fascinating internal coup were we spent the better of the day unbelievable not sure who actually was the leader of his majesties official opposition. But as of now, finally, Rustad has resigned. One crazy detail: BC Cons were bringing in about 350k this quarter, at a rate of 200k spend per month and 1
Im kind of curious about this was he denying that residential schools occurred or disputing the fact that they have found no remains in these mass graves with all the equipment they have used.
Heck here in Kimberley St Eugene Golf Course was a site of a residential school .
disputing the fact that they have found no remains in these mass graves with all the equipment they have used.
Sounds like a residential school denier talking point. They didn't dig up the potential burial sites found in Kamloops if this is what you are commenting on, so I don't really understand the "all the equipment they have used" bit???
Sounds like a residential school denier talking point. They didn't dig up the potential burial sites found in Kamloops if this is what you are commenting on, so I don't really understand the "all the equipment they have used" bit???
From my understanding bodies have been discovered at many sites and the detection equipment at Kamloops displayed findings of potential bodies but none have been dug up at this point . I’m not sure how that makes me a residential school denier
I do recall Kamloops was the place Justin Trudeau flew over to go surfing to bust to attend the first truth and reconciliation day
disputing the fact that they have found no remains in these mass graves with all the equipment they have used.
This is just phrased VERY weirdly. Like yes, the local indigenous groups, as per their practice and rights, did not want to dig up the grave sites. But you are phrasing this as if equivalent to saying no remains have been found despite "all the equipment used". It's the kind of slippery phrasing Dallas Brodie uses.
This is just phrased VERY weirdly. Like yes, the local indigenous groups, as per their practice and rights, did not want to dig up the grave sites. But you are phrasing this as if equivalent to saying no remains have been found despite "all the equipment used". It's the kind of slippery phrasing Dallas Brodie uses.
I asked you a simple question as to what part of the Residential Schools he is questioning . No denial of anything and now you phrase me as Residential School Denier .
If you followed Indigenous history you would know how important the burial of the dead is. Therefore some may question why they do not want the remains given a proper burial . Its a question that can be asked .
I know very little about Rustad but he still was a better choice than Eby fore me knowing nothing about him .
Im sure your a strong supporter of Land Acknowledgments as well
No, I said YOU phrased things like a residential school denier does. It was really weird to be going on about how they didn't discover anything despite "all the equipment used" when you know very well they didn't want to disturb the potential burial cites by exuming them. Or do you:
If you followed Indigenous history you would know how important the burial of the dead is. Therefore some may question why they do not want the remains given a proper burial . Its a question that can be asked .
YUCK. eeeeeeeeeeeewwwwww. Gross. Look at the ignorant white guy implying he knows more about indigenous burial customs. Of course what indigenous people actually say - considering they think burial of the dead is important - is that they should NOT disturb the potential burial cites with exuming them. Yet look how you weaponize their customs to try and find some hypocrisy and play it up as just asking questions. GROSS.
I know very little about Rustad but he still was a better choice than Eby fore me knowing nothing about him .
This is such a good example of lozen's politics. Just utterly blind fervent loyalty to his side - and more the seething hatred to the other side. No need to know anything at all except the colour of the party. That's it. And like proudly so.
It was obvious than when Trudeau - his primary source of hate - left that the hate had to pour somewhere like water down a mountain. Sometimes it would stick on sexist remarks about females in politics. Sometimes it would land on various Trudeau cabinet ministers. Obviously it is all over David Eby who lozen didn't even know who he was a year ago.
No, I said YOU phrased things like a residential school denier does. It was really weird to be going on about how they didn't discover anything despite "all the equipment used" when you know very well they didn't want to disturb the potential burial cites by exuming them. Or do you:YUCK. eeeeeeeeeeeewwwwww. Gross. Look at the ignorant white guy implying he knows more about indi
I definitely know a whole more than you do on Indigenous culture than you by far .
This is such a good example of lozen's politics. Just utterly blind fervent loyalty to his side - and more the seething hatred to the other side. No need to know anything at all except the colour of the party. That's it. And like proudly so.It was obvious than when Trudeau - his primary source of hate - left that the hate had to pour somewhere like water down a mountain. Someti
Blind side to politics is voting for Trudeau a man who showed multiple times he couldn't care less about the indigenous population . He promised them clean drinking water a massive fail, Fired his indigenous justice minister for telling the truth , skipped the first national reconciliation day to go surfing and literally flew over Kamloops were he was invited , never put in place the recommendations which he said he would . A person who is open has even admitted he would consider Carney over Pierre. A brain dead fxxcking idiot voted for Trudeau three times . Heck I even voted for Trudeau once
Do I hate Trudeau of course I do he fucxxd Canada for generations . I still believe he should be tried for treason in Rural Alberta
Actually I knew Eby before I moved here with his legalization of drugs but since I have been here almost 3 years Ive learned what a fuxxking idiot he is in many of his policies and the fact he only cares about Vancouver and the Island and not the rest of BC
Lmao. Buddy you just ****ed it up. You just misquoted indigenous cultural beliefs about exuming bodies to get the opposite conclusion, trying to pathetically "ask questions" about why they haven't done it. You don't get to pretend you know anything about indigenous culture ffs.
I cut out your hilarious rant about Trudeau - HE IS GONE! You can stop ranting.
Actually I knew Eby before I moved here with his legalization of drugs but since I have been here almost 3 years Ive learned what a fuxxking idiot he is in many of his policies and the fact he only cares about Vancouver and the Island and not the rest of BC
Uhh Eby rolled back some of the Hogan era drug policies. It's interesting that with Trudeau you always have your "list" but here it is just empty things that it is an "idiot" and "doesn't care about the rest of BC" just totally made up insults with zero substance.
Uke how do you feel about MPs exposing the very thing the likes of you have denied for years? Yes, I am referring to Michelle Rempel Garner(and others) destroying Lena Diab and Canada's immigration policies.
Uke how do you feel about MPs exposing the very thing the likes of you have denied for years? Yes, I am referring to Michelle Rempel Garner(and others) destroying Lena Diab and Canada's immigration policies.
I read an article that over 1 million immigrants are unaccounted for here in Canada that is outrageous
On a lighter side
Broken YouTube LinkUke how do you feel about MPs exposing the very thing the likes of you have denied for years? Yes, I am referring to Michelle Rempel Garner(and others) destroying Lena Diab and Canada's immigration policies.
I have no idea what you are talking about. I suspect the distinction between "you" and "likes of you" is doing a LOT of heavy lifting in that sentence.
A third con abandons the conservative party. Carney now 1 shy of a majority.
Guys, friendly tip, you gotta get rid of Poilievre.
Great you caught another awful Canadian politician in a lie. Pierre is borderline irrelevant now anyways.
He is the most likely winner of the next election and represents the constituency of almost half the country, how on earth do you get to “borderline irrelevant”?
Pierre isn’t winning anything. Last election made it perfectly clear he is NOT the answer.
A third con abandons the conservative party. Carney now 1 shy of a majority.
Guys, friendly tip, you gotta get rid of Poilievre.
We knew this long before you did. Pierre is and has always been a joke. Didn't get my vote last time and certainly wouldn't get it now.
