Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k

I get now why you don't understand, that it's actually true! Do you seriously think that Pasting is in his AI-rage on average 30:70?! Can't you imagine, that everyone with a reasonable hand will call the clown and it will be often multiway? Did you see that Paisting was before the AI-rage 20 stacks above EV and after 20 below (so he was actually not running good there)? Did you ever play AoF which is 8bb deep? Swings there are already crazy, now do the same with +100bb. +100bb as Paisting also will sometimes have doubled up or more, so safe to assume, that he has been a few times shoving multiple stacks in 1 hand. You also should probably visit an optician, the graph raises here and there. And now explain me that AI-thingy, keen to hear what smart people like you know what I don't ;-)

So it's often multiway. Paisting wins in 150 hands about 10% of the hands. Let's say 5 of those are multiway. Where are these 5 wins in the graph, and the graph goes up 300-500 big blinds? Are you just ignorant and don't you really get it?

This is the real chart, showing the correct value for bb/100. It's not fake – it has to be real because it's an image from PokerTracker. No chance of faking it – hahaha.

Irrelevant. There is no data that shows how many times in a row a jabroni raised his blinds.

Even the biggest manipulated rng denalialist are saying you are liar. I think your story is over here.

Go the optician, srsly!

End of the discussion with you from my side as it's pointless.

So Paisting actually had a positive winrate of 33.33bb/100 for 32k hands???
And you think thats more likely than paisting openshoving 500 hands in a row??
You clearly dont know Paisting

No – I just wanted to show the clueless (not to say unintelligent) FR-NIT how easy it is to fake the graph, or rather its labeling, like that liar Paisting always does. First, he loses $400 on 10NL because he's too stupid to play poker, then he loses $1500 on 200NL in no time (because he's even dumber than we think). And guys like FR-NIT don't realize that it's impossible to lose $1500 on 10NL in 1000 hands without the graph rising even once.

Well, the graph isnt exactly point for point when it contains 32k hands
So if you lose 100bb 8 hands and win 100bb 2 hands it will likely just look like a fast downsloping line with some exceptions.
Which there are, sometimes the line seems to stagnate like on the -900 line. This probably means he broke around even on his last 10 shoves.
And on the height of -1150 the graph definitely goes up before falling back again.

Furthermore if you look at the posted graph with their stats
Paisting lost 71.60bb/100 in 31959 hands which is 319,59*71,6 = 22882 big blinds
No coincidence there that that matches with the -C won of $2288 perfectly in line with playing 10nl
And paisting isnt clever enough to do this math. Furthermore, if he wanted to hide his stupidity he wouldnt have posted the graph in the first place. Heck, he wouldnt have started this thread.

Paistings is legendary micro games degenerate gambler.

Get the f out! Who are you, what do you know what I don't?! Nothing! You are too effing ******ed to even realize, that the graph goes up in between, but you are comfortable with insulting me!? I challenge you on bare-knuckles. Accept?

Wow, FR has just gone All in. J2Bad, call or fold?

If there ever was a good analogy of how the OP plays I think this one has topped it.

j2bad when and where? I called you out!

Haha - how ridiculous you're making yourself look. I definitely trust you more with fistfights than with things that require intelligence.
So no - no bare-knuckles.

Yeah, I knew that, guys like you with an IQ higher than 140 (I'm 133) will chicken out. How about commenting on the graph? Did you visit the optician? Still my offer stands, you tell where, I will make it happen, don't worry!

Your IQ is higher than 140?!

It's a fold! inet-hero at it's finest! Insulting people in the anonymity of the inet, but once someone threatens to take it to the real world, chicken out. Pathetic!

You definitely have a relatively low IQ. You're a typical example of the Dunning-Kruger effect (Google can help you with that - I don't suppose you're familiar with it). Sorry bro - people with IQs over 130 tend not to talk about their IQ (believe me - I know what I'm talking about).
But I find you funny - you cheer me up - thank you!

It's always hilarious when guys like FR-Nit freak out when someone points out how wrong they are and they justify it by claiming to have been insulted. Yes, you were insulted, but look at the thread to see who started it... - You reap what you sow - lol

LOL, Dunning-Kruger!? Nice try, I'm no subject to that, but let's leave my intelligence or stupidness on the side-lines, what's your motivation to post that much in a thread like that? Why so much hate towards Paistings?

I don't freak out, I just insist on you going to an optician, bro! Srsly, you need it!

Good night my boy - try to stay calm (its better for your heart - lol)

Kid, I'm not your boy. Have you been at the optician? Can you see now that the graph has a few spots of going up?

Sure my boy - believe what you want - ridicolous….

Then how about my offer for bare-knuckles, you ****! Wherever, no costs for you. I'll pay to make it happen, your hospital you'll pay on your own. Deal?