President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
If the boot(licker) fits...
[URL="https://newrepublic.com/post/210013/fbi-investigation-atlantic-reporter-kash-patel-drinking"]FBI Launches Probe Into Reporter Who Covered Kash Patel’s Drinking
[/URL]
The FBI has launched a criminal leak investigation into the Atlantic reporter who reported on Kash Patel’s excessive drinking and unexplained absences.
I'm really confused about the Elway/mongidig story.
Can a mod 100% confirm it's the same person?
If yes, this whole weird act of denying and attempt at distantiate himself from the former account really feels like a pure rebranding attempt.
I would be fine with the new account if there was aknowledgment of the prior one.
This has already been done. Weeks ago, coordi confirmed that mongidig said he lost his password and that's why he created the Elway account. I have no idea why mongidig/Elway is continuing to half promote this charade, and I personally doubt that he lost the password to his old account.
Leak the DMs, coordi! Release the mongidig files!
The "Victor" gimmick is getting very boring too
This surprises me unless you are talking about women who have been separated for some time but whose divorces were not yet final. There was a documentary about the demise of Ashley Madison, and I seem to recall that one of the reveals was that a high percentage of the women on the site were just fake accounts controlled by people employed by Ashley Madison. In other words, it
i’ve actually done a lot of digging into this because it’s a fascinating example of astroturfing done right, at least initially. whether it’s dating apps, gaming lobbies, new discords, livestreams, networking groups, whatever, nobody wants to walk into an empty room, so a lot of platforms quietly manufacture activity early on. fake users, seeded engagement, bots, staff accounts, all the same basic idea. get people through the door first, worry about authenticity later. Ashley Madison just got greedy. they realized men would pay a lot more if a bunch of attractive women seemed interested but never quite available... because women amirite 😀
i actually had some first hand experience with this, in the early days of streaming, i did some consulting for a streaming platform, none of it was of the mong category, it was all pg-13 stuff, but when they launched they hired a lot of young women and paid them to stream on full time schedules - eventually they dropped them once the site gained critical mass, but the last thing they wanted was someone downloading the app and finding only 8 people streaming, so they hired dozens of women to do it
but going back to the earlier discussion about married people, what caught me off guard was how many “single” people aren’t actually single in any meaningful sense. you see way more “ethically non-monogamous” married people now on the apps, usually just abbreviated to enm on their bio, and more than once i’ve gone on dates with women who presented themselves as single, childless, uncomplicated, only to casually reveal halfway through dinner that they were still married, had kids, and were “figuring things out”
noped out of both. not out of moral outrage, just neither was impressive enough to justify stepping into that kind of chaos
one of them i got along with well enough that we stayed loosely in touch, and months later i’m still seeing her post photos on instagram with her husband about how in love they are. and at that point you genuinely don’t know what to believe. maybe he really was the abusive monster she described in utah that she fled and she took him back. maybe none of it was true and maybe the family had moved and she showed up months early and just wanted to cheat for few months while he was still back in utah wrapping up loose ends. who knows - either way i'm not going to text or call her to ask what's up with that since i'm staying clear of that hornets nest
either way, if you’ve spent enough time on the apps, you realize a surprising chunk of the “dating market” isn’t actually single people dating. it’s a lot of people mid-divorce, emotionally checked out, testing the waters, or still deeply entangled while telling themselves they’re available
i also agree it's dumb to be on the apps if you're both in the same area and you are trying to be discreet, but then again i've heard of a bunch of couples breaking up over the fact that one spouse's friend was the bearer of bad news and texted screenshots of their spouse on the apps that they had come across
Lol the clown show continues.
would you be willing to a well on this, i'd be interested to learn more about it
it's something i have absolutely zero direct exposure to
Haha, maybe if I get really bored at work one day. It still doesn't even feel that strange looking back, because it was all I knew. When the church surrounds you from birth, everything simply seems normal. It wasn't weird that a bunch of people like geezer were forcing me to talk to strangers about jesus, it was just another wednesday.
Certainly funny discovering that most denominations actually consider evangelicals the crazy ones.
This surprises me unless you are talking about women who have been separated for some time but whose divorces were not yet final. There was a documentary about the demise of Ashley Madison, and I seem to recall that one of the reveals was that a high percentage of the women on the site were just fake accounts controlled by people employed by Ashley Madison. In other words, it
No, it was a normal app (Hinge I think but not sure). They were fully married.... The one told him after they had sex 3 times. He was like WTF is wrong with you.....
The drunk deserves it, the demented old person does not. I'm sure even you are smart enough to figure out why.
I guess I'm not. I don't see why you think it's appropriate to take advantage of a drunk person.
If the person knew they were diabetic at the time they ate the Twinkies(TM) and understood the possible consequences of eating those sweets, then they deserved to die.
Now we're getting somewhere. A glimpse into your dark side.
damn these false flags just keep getting worse lmao
Spoiler
Citation for what? That christians have a persecution fetish? The key symbol for the entire religion is Jesus dying on a ****ing cross.
Christians in the first couple centuries A.D. were certainly persecuted. And many Christians today throughout the world are still being persecuted.
Christian persecution in America is relatively rare.
But whatever, it's my own fault for engaging with you. No worries, shifting you to Victor protocol from now on.
Bye!!!
Haha, maybe if I get really bored at work one day. It still doesn't even feel that strange looking back, because it was all I knew. When the church surrounds you from birth, everything simply seems normal. It wasn't weird that a bunch of people like geezer were forcing me to talk to strangers about jesus, it was just another wednesday.Certainly funny discovering that most denom
Not sure why you are again lumping me in with the folks at your childhood church. Neither I nor anyone else at my church has 'forced' anyone to talk to strangers about Jesus.
And I would say that most denominations would consider so-called fundamentalists (like myself) crazy, but would not think that about evangelicals as a whole.
I guess I'm not. I don't see why you think it's appropriate to take advantage of a drunk person.
Why do you lie so much? I think it's always wrong to take advantage of anyone at any time for any reason.
Now we're getting somewhere. A glimpse into your dark side.
How so? I think someone dying for any reason, including for being willfully stoopid, is tragic.
Anyhoo, I'm growing weary of this derail of the Trump thread. If you want, we can continue this in RGT or in a more appropriate thread where I can call out your lies.
Until then, you can have the last word.
Not sure why you are again lumping me in with the folks at your childhood church. Neither I nor anyone else at my church has 'forced' anyone to talk to strangers about Jesus.
And I would say that most denominations would consider so-called fundamentalists (like myself) crazy, but would not think that about evangelicals as a whole.
I find it funny folks can make fun of your religious ideology but if you tried that with the trans ideology you get banned
Making too much fun of Islam might get you the boot. Which makes more sense pragmatically, because an Islamic terrorist group might threaten the owners of this site if they allowed too much criticism of Islam.
Trump still has not conceded that he lost in 2020.
What exactly is "the trans ideology?"