GTO+/CardRunnersEV?
This is the support thread for CardRunnersEV, which is hand EV analysis software.
Hi guys , sorry for my english ,
Can someone explain me the rounding hands filter function ???
With the rounding feature, you can round either the entire range or individual hands.
To use the rounding feature, press "LOCK DECISION" and "EDIT DECISION."
Then, click on "Special Options."
Select the "Rounding" tab and choose which amount to round for (e.g., 1, 2, 3, etc.).
Click "ROUND" to confirm.
Now, click on any hands you want to round.
If you want to round the entire range, double-click the bar below the matrix (this bar contains all hands in the range, so double-clicking it will apply the rounding to the whole range).
See the screenshot below.
Scylla,
Are Equity breakdowns still in the pipeline? What do you think is the timeline?
Toggle from hand classes to equity breakdown here would be great.
Currently, equity display can be accessed using the 'Strategy/EV/Equity' toggle.
Additional features related to this theme will be introduced in v175.
I continue to didnt understand the function ehat did it round ??
Ex if i select 2 it splits the range in 50 1 size 50 ceck ???
Will there be a feature to force the solver not to split? I want to give 3 bet sizes on the turn for different runouts but I want the solver to only pick one or two bet sizes for a given board
Will there be a feature to force the solver not to split? I want to give 3 bet sizes on the turn for different runouts but I want the solver to only pick one or two bet sizes for a given board
We can consider it for future releases, although I don't immediately see how we could accomplish this during the solve.
We could create a feature to round after the solve, but implementing it during the solve would be technically much more difficult to achieve.
I continue to didnt understand the function ehat did it round ??
Ex if i select 2 it splits the range in 50 1 size 50 ceck ???
The function will round the actual distribution to the nearest multiple of X increments.
For example, if you select 1, the function will assign the entire hand to the action with the highest frequency.
If you select 5, it will distribute the hand into 5 increments.
These increments will be allocated in a way that is closest to the original distribution.
For instance, if the actual distribution is 65/20/15 and you’re rounding to 5 increments, the function will assign 3 increments to the first action and 1 increment each to the other two actions. So, with 5 increments, the 65/20/15 distribution will be rounded to 60/20/20.
Scy, this is what happens when I want to review a hand I've already played... I can't go back to the exact point where the mistake happened.
In this case, I'm playing in "loose mode," and the sequence is B-XX- decision on the river.
Every time I try to analyze a spot, I run into these issues (some of which have been mentioned before, but maybe a video will make it clearer):
I don’t get to the moment of the mistake, but instead, I go back to the start of the hand.
The replayer and the real-time waiting style are a bit uncomfortable; I’ve been thinking for a while that it would be great if this could be improved.
When I go back to play vs GTO, I have to set everything up from scratch again.
Sorry for insisting, but I hope you take this feedback in the spirit of helping improve things. I’m sharing it with the intention to help, just like I always have.
Scy, this is what happens when I want to review a hand I've already played... I can't go back to the exact point where the mistake happened.
In this case, I'm playing in "loose mode," and the sequence is B-XX- decision on the river.
Every time I try to analyze a spot, I run into these issues (some of which have been mentioned before, but maybe a video will make it clearer):
I don’t get to the moment of the mistake, but instead, I go back to the start of the hand.
The replayer and the r
We will circle back to the trainer in the coming months and re-evaluate it.
We have kept track of the feature requests for the trainer so far, and I believe that yours is already somewhere on the list.
I will make a note of your request again, just in case it was somehow previously overlooked, or written down in a slightly different form.
We will circle back to the trainer in the coming months and re-evaluate it.
We have kept track of the feature requests for the trainer so far, and I believe that yours is already somewhere on the list.
I will make a note of your request again, just in case it was somehow previously overlooked, or written down in a slightly different form.
Oki, thanks!♥
Yes I see, but what is needed is the breakdown into equity buckets. I hope this is what you have in mind.
Scylla,
I'm running solves for HJ vs BTN SRP using a 49 flop subset, with multiple sizings schemes. The first uses all four sizings (g2,g3,B75 and B25) and the rest uses each of the four sizings separately. This is the same for all 49 flops. I am running them separately. I don't suppose there is a way I can do them all together without creating them all one at as time.
Scylla, I'm running solves for HJ vs BTN SRP using a 49 flop subset, with multiple sizings schemes. The first uses all four sizings (g2,g3,B75 and B25) and the rest uses each of the four sizings separately. This is the same for all 49 flops. I am running them separately. I don't suppose there is a way I can do them all together without creating them all one at as time.
There's two ways of joining databases together.
The first is to place the files in a directory such as C:/tmp.
Then:
1) Go to "Run solver"
2) Select the tab "Database"
3) Click on "Merge files"
4) Select the directory C:/tmp and accept.
A downside here would be that it will not be possible to maintain the weights of the trees.
The second method would work better for your purposes.
For this:
1) Load the first file
2) Go to "Run solver"
3) Click on the "Lock" icon
4) Load the next file
5) Go to 2 and repeat for all the files
See the screenshot below.
And if i round the entir range with 2 and the range is setted on 3 different bet size how that it split it ??
Didi i need to run the solver again after i applied the rounding functiob to one hand or to the entire range ??
And if i round the entir range with 2 and the range is setted on 3 different bet size how that it split it ??
Check - 22%
B33 - 12%
B75 - 45%
B125 - 21%
-> Round for 2
Check - 50%
B33 - 0%
B75 - 50%
B125 - 0%
Rounds every indivudal combo in the entire range when clicked into whole range, but does not round global frequencies. Global does change ofc, but its not rounded.
Didi i need to run the solver again after i applied the rounding functiob to one hand or to the entire range ??
Yes, ofc. Any change in sim -> re-run.
Thanks !!
I also would like to run a sim with 4 size of bet on the flop to the solver and the forced him to choose only one size or 2 ,ex
Btn vs bb
Board axx
Flop bet size btn
33/50/75/125/150 %
And then force the solver to rerun the sim and choose only one or max 2 of them , how can i do it ???
if i whant to edit a database how can i do it without editing every sim ????
I also would like to run a sim with 4 size of bet on the flop to the solver and the forced him to choose only one size or 2 ,ex
Btn vs bb
Board axx
Flop bet size btn
33/50/75/125/150 %
And then force the solver to rerun the sim and choose only one or max 2 of them , how can i do it ???
After solving, in the editor:
1) Lock the decision, and set it up for editing
2) Click on "Special options"
3) Select the tab "Merging"
4) Select which actions you want to merge, and which action you want to merge into. Accept and close the menu.
5) Double-click on the bar below the matrix to apply the merge to the entire decision.