Israel/Palestine thread
Think this merits its own thread...
Discuss my fellow 2+2ers..
AM YISRAEL CHAI.
[QUOTE=Crossnerd]Edit: RULES FOR THIS THREAD
Posting guidelines for Politics and Soci...
These are our baselines. We're not reinventing the wheel here. If you aren't sure if something is acceptable to post, its better to ask first. If you think someone is posting something that violates the above guidelines, please report it or PM me rather than responding in kind.
To reiterate some of the points:
1. No personal attacks. This is a broad instruction, but, in general, we want to focus on attacking an argument rather than the poster making it. It is fine to say a post is antisemitic; it is not okay to call someone an antisemite over and over. If you believe someone is making antisemitic posts, report them or PM me. The same goes for calling people "baby killers" and "genocide lovers". You are allowed to argue that an action supports genocide or that the consequences of certain policies results in the death of children, but we are no longer going to be speaking to one another's intentions. It is not productive to the conversation and doesn't further any debate.
2. Racist posts and other bigoted statements that target a particular group or individuals of such groups with derogatory comments are not allowed. This should not need further explanation.
3. Graphic Images need to be in spoilers with a trigger warning.
4. Wishing Harm on other posters will result in an immediate timeout.
5. Genocidal statements such as "Kill 'em all" etc, are no longer permissible in the thread.
If anyone has any questions about the above, please PM me. I don't want a discussion about the rules to derail the content of this thread. If anything needs clarifying, I will do that in this thread.
Please be aware this thread is strictly moderated[/quote]
32078 Replies
I think any solution that is in accordance with the Geneva convention, and is legal, but will for certain bring more war and deaths to both sides, is 100 times worse.
We need to remember that the standards we put in place were meant to achieve a purpose, not that they are the purpose itself
For Jal, Vic and company, this is a theoretical debate about imperialism, legality, Marxist agendas and so forth.
For us it is life and death. We see things through a different lens
Couldn't point #1 be used as justification to destroy the state of Israel? Many of the Israelis in Israel are not "native" to that place, So, in essence, it's not like they are giving up "birth rights" or whatever is the new woke phrase?
As to the rest of your points, are you justifying the displacement of millions of people? No future, Hamas stronghold, too expensive to bother rebuilding reasons & excuses etc etc?
I realise what Israel is up against and fully appreciate how you feel as an Israeli
It is an argument against 'right to exist'. It's more 'might makes right' which is the antithesis of 'right to exist'.
It would also be an attrocity.
--He just retweeted this promote himself and pat himself on the back, but this is the last 2 paragraphs of an article Richard Hanania wrote last January, arguing why Palestinians leaving Gaza is the most logical solution to the problem. And why there is no real hope Palestinians ever create a functional society.
Hanania is a neo Nazi as well you know, considering you've linked his crap before. Nobody who isn't a neo Nazi cares what he burbles. Any point you attempt to make will automatically be null and void by virtue of the fact that you're linking neo Nazis to accentuate it. How you can't see this is quite stunning.
For those reasons, I also do not care too much for the definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity. We need to have them in place, to set certain standards, and for the Veil of Ignorance notion, but it should not prevent us from doing what is right.
lol, you guys spent the last year arguing about the definitions of things like ethnic cleansing and genocide. It was obvious to all of us that it was all in bad faith but it's good the see the mask is well and truly off.
Yeah, let's just keep everything exactly as it is, and expect a different outcome...
Number 1 is not my reasoning but using Jal reasoning against him. I could care less about birth rights and native agenda. I believe is realpolitik, fair solutions that are sustainable.
For those reasons, I also do not care too much for the definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity. We need to have them in place, to set certain standards, and for the Veil of Ignorance notion, but it should not prevent us from doing what is right.
As for re the displacement of millions of people – it wil
There are standard definitions of war crimes. Forced displacement is defined as such. Even if you personally disagree it should be.
I think any solution that is in accordance with the Geneva convention, and is legal, but will for certain bring more war and deaths to both sides, is 100 times worse.
We need to remember that the standards we put in place were meant to achieve a purpose, not that they are the purpose itself
Forced displacement certainly wont be legal or in accordance with the Geneva convention, due to it being a war crime and crime against humanity.
lol, you guys spent the last year arguing about the definitions of things like ethnic cleansing and genocide. It was obvious to all of us that it was all in bad faith but it's good the see the mask is well and truly off.
You are a freak and a very weird dude.
Also, you uncovered the mask I wasnt wearing since day 1 you re$%$d
You are a freak and a very weird dude.
Also, you uncovered the mask I wasnt wearing since day 1 you re$%$d
I consider accusations against Israel of genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid etc as bad faith tactics and flat out untrue.
Forced displacement though is an actual war/humanity crime either way you cut it. I sincerely hope you're not on board with this.
There are standard definitions of war crimes. Forced displacement is defined as such. Even if you personally disagree it should be.
Forced displacement certainly wont be legal or in accordance with the Geneva convention, due to it being a war crime and crime against humanity.
You are missing my point. I don’t care if it is a war crime and im not arguing against that fact. All im saying that even though it is a war crime it is a favorable solution, if in the end this solution (or any other) will save human life (from both sides).
I care about real life outcomes, not legal definitions.
I think im the only one here that is actually arguing for a Palestinian state (that is also based in reality and not some crazy fantasy)
I consider accusations against Israel of genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid etc as bad faith tactics and flat out untrue.
Forced displacement though is an actual war/humanity crime either way you cut it. I sincerely hope you're not on board with this.
Im on board with any solution that will end the war and ensure prosperity for both sides. Do you have one?
Couldn't point #1 be used as justification to destroy the state of Israel? Many of the Israelis in Israel are not "native" to that place, So, in essence, it's not like they are giving up "birth rights" or whatever is the new woke phrase?
As to the rest of your points, are you justifying the displacement of millions of people? No future, Hamas stronghold, too expensive to bother rebuilding reasons & excuses etc etc?
I realise what Israel is up against and fully appreciate how you feel as an Israeli
#1 has been used as justification to destroy the state of Israel. Arabs have been trying to destroy Israel for 80 years using this justification. They have just failed at it. At the end of the day Israel is a thriving nation, and Gaza is a failed city state controlled by violent gangs and hostile neighbors that want nothing to do with them, because of the failure of Arabs to destroy Israel.
Also, again I would like to reiterate there is and has been a tremendous amount of "forced displacement" of people in the last few years. It is going on in China, Ukraine, Georgia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and 50 places in Africa. This is one of a very few cases where we have decided that no matter how bad it gets people aren't allowed to leave, for purely political reasons that have nothing to do with human rights.
You are a freak and a very weird dude.
Also, you uncovered the mask I wasnt wearing since day 1 you re$%$d
All the handwringing about how it's not technically ethnic cleansing, how the people of Gaza will be allowed to return to their homes, how this definitely wasn't about stealing land, all of it was an obvious pack of lies from day 1.
Rest assured future historians will see through the bullshit and the moral rot even more clearly than those of us living through this.
Would it be an atrocity to move the Israelis out of Israel as long as they are provided with a long term solution?
If there were 20+ countries which were majority jewish, politically organized in favor of jews, where language and culture were jewish, not particularly if the solution implied moving to one of those countries with full equal rights to the citizens of that country
Would it be an atrocity to move the Israelis out of Israel as long as they are provided with a long term solution?
No more an atrocity than telling everyone to leave New York to give it back to Native Americans. Or telling Turks to leave Istanbul/Constantinople to give it back to any Christian survivors of the numerous pogroms to create the Turkish ethnostate.
If you think it is moral for people to be compelled to stay in this condition, being controlled by violent gangs and hostile neighbors guaranteeing no future, then we will have to agree to disagree.
![](https://tptstorageaccount38381.blob.core.windows.net/images/resized_israel-gaza-war-gty-lv-231224-3_1703438848892_hpMain_16x9_1600.jpg?width=1440&height=810)
You are missing my point. I don’t care if it is a war crime and im not arguing against that fact. All im saying that even though it is a war crime it is a favorable solution, if in the end this solution (or any other) will save human life (from both sides).
I care about real life outcomes, not legal definitions.
I think im the only one here that is actually arguing for a Palestinian state (that is also based in reality and not some crazy fantasy)
In real life terms...it's a ****ing war crime. Merely writing off war crimes as legal definitions doesn't cut it. It's a favourable solution for Israel, not for ordinary Palestinians, including those who want no truck with Hamas or indeed intifada.
Why are you assuming forced displacement will lead to a Palestinian state?
The Muslim American groups still have Trump plastered all over their banners and profile photos on social this morning. Wonder what the over/under is on removing those in abject shame, after you vote the fox into the hen house.
This is one of the most poignant "chickens for KFC" moments of our time.
In real life terms...it's a ****ing war crime. Merely writing off war crimes as legal definitions doesn't cut it. It's a favourable solution for Israel, not for ordinary Palestinians, including those who want no truck with Hamas or indeed intifada.
Why are you assuming forced displacement will lead to a Palestinian state?
I personally dont think it will. I dont think Palestinians have a culture capable of forming a functional state. But they aren't alone. Half the world is in some form of a failed state. Westerners take it for granted that state building is easy, but it is something half the world never really figured out.
It is amusing, because you live in a nation with a thriving giant diaspora population because a lot of people were "forced" to leave for political and socio-economic reasons.
In many ways Gaza in 2024 is just as bad as Ireland in 1845. And there is no reason to assume keeping everyone there and dumping any amount of resources into it will move the needle much, given their political culture (controlled by popularly supported violent gangs) and geopolitical realities (neighbors want nothing to do with them).
Can you ever post something with merit, that has any content or real-world relevancy?
For a starter, can you offer a solution to this situation?
And the idea of a transfer, in this case, is far from abhorrent, for many reasons:
1. Many of the Palestinians in Gaza are not "native" to that place, and even according to them, they were displaced there. So, in essence, it's not like they are giving up "birth rights" or whatever is the new woke phrase.
2. Gaza has no real valid possibility to develop. It
I've posted a possible solution many times, and each time you ignore it - a separate Palestinian state.
1) Many Israelis are not "native" to Israel or to the West Bank, so perhaps they should leave - it's not like they are giving up "birth rights" or whatever is the new woke phrase.
2) Nonsense
3) Not if the Palestinians get their own country.
4) Yes, it's gone because you and your fearless boys and girls armed with Western tech destroyed it and tens of thousands of lives. The lack of self-awareness here is astounding.
5) Was the Good Friday Agreement a "reward" to the IRA? Seems to be working a lot better than before.
Im on board with any solution that will end the war and ensure prosperity for both sides. Do you have one?
Welcome aboard, soldier.
Westerners take it for granted that state building is easy, but it is something half the world never really figured out.
probably bc the USA spends insane amounts of money to destabilize them. they just spent a trillion dollars to destroy Syria. ffs they just spent like 40 million to meddle in the Georgian election.
The Muslim American groups still have Trump plastered all over their banners and profile photos on social this morning. Wonder what the over/under is on removing those in abject shame, after you vote the fox into the hen house.
This is one of the most poignant "chickens for KFC" moments of our time.
Or, follow me for a second, like muslims in many other muslim majority countries, they actually don't care too much about so called "palestinians" in particular?