RFK - Make America Healthy? again?
I believe this guy is going to need his own thread.
Next up: the evil mandates of forced auto insurance before allowing you to operate dangerous machinery on public roadways. People should just deal with the consequences of injury, death or property destruction if it happens.
Morally horrific lawmakers should be jailed for our insurance laws.
Next up: the evil mandates of forced auto insurance before allowing you to operate dangerous machinery on public roadways. People should just deal with the consequences of injury, death or property destruction if it happens.
Morally horrific lawmakers should be jailed for our insurance laws.
are you proposing mandatory insurance to cover for infecting third parties under tort law, for all carriers of infectious diseases? like AIDS or epathite? if not, then why do you bring this up?
Did I say anything about insurance for infectious diseases?
Or do you now see the futility of arguing with someone who equated a hat wearing mandate to a vaccine mandate?
Did I say anything about insurance for infectious diseases?
Or do you now see the futility of arguing with someone who equated a hat wearing mandate to a vaccine mandate?
Well you are discussing car insurance mandates while we discuss vaccine mandates, what's the link?
you guys claimed it wasn't forced because losing your job and not being hire-able isn't force, and i made an example of what you would consider forced if done by the government.
If the gvmnt can mandate anything under threat of losing your job that's a use of government force, and that would be a forcing action.
You deny that, so you should accept a hat mandate, or the mandate to eat steak every 2 days, or literally any other mandate, wouldn't be a use of force even if it came with the penalty of losing your job attached.
That's why i can use the hat mandate ironic example: because it's either ALWAYS a use of FORCE to have a penalty of "losing your job" if you don't comply, or never. And it clearly always is.
You are simply in bad faith when you deny that mandating something to someone, under threat of losing a job if they don't comply, is a very vanilla use of force.
After a couple of years with COVID in a community everyone got exposed to it multiple times. You know that same as the cold.
There aren't people who never met COVID around anymore.
I know more than a few people that haven't contracted covid. But yeah, exposed to it, sure.
Watching this is like getting a glimpse into a round table meeting of reetards.
People on the internet--the vaccine is harming zillions of people even killing some.
Out in the wild--haven't met a single one or even heard of any from anyone I know lol
I know two people. Both have had minor systemic issues previously and their vaccine complications were relatively minor.
So severe, you don't even know what the injury was 😃
According to experts in this forum, Trump could mandate wearing MAGA hats nationwide and it wouldn't be "forcing" if the penalty was just not being legally allowed to be hired if they don't.
ANY state penalty for failing to execute a state mandate is FORCE (or threat thereof).
He could if it were just for government jobs. He's pretty much already doing that.
People could still get nearly any job without being vaccinated.
He could if it were just for government jobs. He's pretty much already doing that.
People could still get nearly any job without being vaccinated.
Yes, requiring wearing a hat for a job is not forcing anyone to wear a hat. For instance, you have to wear a hat to deliver pizzas for some restaurants. I've never once felt like I was being forced to wear a hat, and I wouldn't feel that way even if I worked at that restaurant. It's just a stupid concept.
In this thread, to be forced requires one to be bound and having no means of avoiding x happening to them.
No. I wasn't mandated. Fortunately I didn't have to choose between getting a vaccine and feeding my family and not getting a vaccine and not feeding my family.
A lot did though.
And before you say they still had a choice, threatening someone with the removal of their ability to feed their family is not freedom of choice. It's using force.
Didn't have you pegged as one of them wokester SJWs. huh
2 infants dead from whooping cough in Louisiana
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/02/healt...
3rd measles death reported in Texas
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/06/second-c...
RFK Jr. praises anti-vax pediatrician Ben Edwards
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
The same Dr. Ben Edwards had measles when he treated children
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/19/healt...
When you add these stories together, you find a mix of arrogance, stupidity and callousness in the anti-vax community which is something else.
Spoiler
Please provide a summary of linked videos. Thank you.
I'll give you a summary. It's a video of Dr Paul Offit (a huge pharma shill) whining about RFK doing an investigation into the causes of autism.
Why are guys like Offit so scared of an investigation into the causes I wonder.
I don't know how RFK has never seen an adult autistic person. Has he not seen Elon?
I don't even think Elon is autistic.
I'll give you a summary. It's a video of Dr Paul Offit (a huge pharma shill) whining about RFK doing an investigation into the causes of autism.
Why are guys like Offit so scared of an investigation into the causes I wonder.
Bro, have you ever thought about how doctors MAKE money when you’re sick???
If Elon isn't autistic, then 99.9% of the self-identified autistic people on the internet are also not autistic. Quite the conundrum.
If he doesn't qualify, then the word as we currently use it has no meaning.
he is on the spectrum almost certainly but we should limit the word autistic to people who can't live by themselves imo
