President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump

I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?

So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at

105 Views
28 April 2019 at 04:18 AM
Reply...

39493 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by Victor

quick reminder that 90% of the people that your boy Obama drone striked were civilians.

Why do you keep pretending that people acknowledge this as a good thing? It’s obviously bad.


It's also notable that Obama apologized and tightened the requirements for future strikes in response to the criticism. And Trump removed those restrictions.

Not excusing the actions, just noting the significant difference that victor would never, ever mention.


oh he apologized?


While Obama eventually admitted a significant civilian death toll from his drone strikes, I think he only apologised for the deaths of two Western hostages (one American, one Italian) in Pakistan.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016...


by Victor

oh he apologized?

He made an error in judgement.


Who gets fired, Hegseth or the watchdog? Or nobody?

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon’s watchdog found that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth put U.S. personnel and their mission at risk when he used the Signal messaging app to convey sensitive information about a military strike against Yemen’s Houthi militants, two people familiar with the findings said Wednesday.


Well, of course

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/02...

President Donald Trump argued Tuesday that former special counsel Jack Smith’s final report — chronicling the criminal case against him for hoarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago — should never be made public.


by Gorgonian

It's also notable that Obama apologized and tightened the requirements for future strikes in response to the criticism. And Trump removed those restrictions.

Not excusing the actions, just noting the significant difference that victor would never, ever mention.

So what you are saying is after 542 Drone Strikes and killing 3797 estimated deaths and a estimated 324 civilians he toned it back. Well how gentlemanly of him .


by lozen

So what you are saying is after 542 Drone Strikes and killing 3797 estimated deaths and a estimated 324 civilians he toned it back. Well how gentlemanly of him .


And he implemented restrictions on those types of strikes THAT DONALD TRUMP REMOVED.

That's the important part you disingenuous fhead. But sure enough you and victor fall all over yourselves to miss the point.


it was more like 3400 civilians if your kill count is correct. Daniel Hale leaked data that by the US's own estimates 90% of the casualties were civilian.


by Gorgonian

And he implemented restrictions on those types of strikes THAT DONALD TRUMP REMOVED.That's the important part you disingenuous fhead. But sure enough you and victor fall all over yourselves to miss the point.

oh did he put in the restrictions before or after this?



by Victor

oh did he put in the restrictions before or after this?

Try saying alexa first. It will work better.


Ill bet the families of these people are satisfied that restrictions were put in place after this



Hey df, you won't get me to apologize for Obama's war crimes. Not sure what you think you're doing here. I hate all violence.


I wonder how much these amazing Obama restrictions helped. I wonder how many people they saved. did they change the ratio to 90% Al Qaeda KHamas Islamists killed?

anyway, this little exercise is example number 454311113 showing that liberals love war and murder, they just want to be in charge of it.


by Victor

liberals love war and murder, they just want to be in charge of it.

Which liberals are you referring to you disingenuous lying prick?

edit: oh look you stopped responding when you got called out for dropping your fat turd of bs accusations and running off without backing it up like a scared little kid. I don't know how you aren't embarrassed.


by Victor

it was more like 3400 civilians if your kill count is correct. Daniel Hale leaked data that by the US's own estimates 90% of the casualties were civilian.

Over one five-month period covered by the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in U.S. drone strikes were not the intended targets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Hal...

You’re making quite an inferential leap there.


no, Im pretty sure thats how stats work


by Gorgonian

Which liberals are you referring to you disingenuous lying prick?

edit: oh look you stopped responding when you got called out for dropping your fat turd of bs accusations and running off without backing it up like a scared little kid. I don't know how you aren't embarrassed.

whats there to respond about? my post was pretty clear. I cant help you understand simple sentences. that was your parents job.


by Victor

whats there to respond about? my post was pretty clear. I cant help you understand simple sentences. that was your parents job.

The question I asked, you disingenuous, lying prick.

"Which liberals are you referring to you disingenuous lying prick?"

Your post was pretty stupid because it demonstrated nothing at all about anything. You didn't show the restrictions were ineffective, because you don't even know what they were or when they were put in place. You ASKED.

You have one mode: call everyone liberals and accuse them of supporting genocide - both without a shred of evidence. Then you spout BJ level nonsense that can be dispelled with toddler logic, claim victory, and run away. Absolute moron.


Your post was pretty stupid because it demonstrated nothing at all about anything. You didn't show the restrictions were ineffective, because you don't even know what they were or when they were put in place. You ASKED.

and you didnt show they were effective. and besides, how effective could they have been? what civilian death toll, as measured by the lol USA murderers, would be acceptable? I know that that number is a big fat 0 for me. and for you its infinite.

the reason that you guys support liberals like Obama and Biden is that they are more effective at the mass murder than people like Trump who brazenly brag about it. liberals put the thinnest veneer over it and you guys clap like seals.


by Victor

and you didnt show they were effective.

I didn't claim they were. You claimed they weren't. Your claim. Defend it or eff off.

by Victor

and besides, how effective could they have been? what civilian death toll, as measured by the lol USA murderers, would be acceptable? I know that that number is a big fat 0 for me. and for you its infinite.

How long were they in effect? You don't even know. Desperate flailing because your position is hopeless and you know it.

by Victor

the reason that you guys support liberals like Obama and Biden

I support neither Obama nor Biden, you disingenuous lying prick.

by Victor

liberals put the thinnest veneer over it and you guys clap like seals.

More lying. I stated EXPLICITLY it doesn't excuse the actions MULTIPLE TIMES. I even zoomed in on it and highlighted it for. You're just a disingenuous, lying prick, and you've made it as clear as day. So thank you for that. But,you should really give up.


by Gorgonian

I didn't claim they were. You claimed they weren't. Your claim. Defend it or eff off.

lol then why did you bring it up?

I support neither Obama nor Biden, you disingenuous lying prick.

weird that you instantly jumped to his defense with regards to bombing civilians all over the world.


by Victor

lol then why did you bring it up?

Because you were equivocating Trump's war crimes with Obama's. Is Trump apologizing and changing anything? No. Did Trump REMOVE Obama's restrictions? YES. So it's a difference. A BIG one. One you'll never bring up. Because you're a lying, disingenuous prick.

by Victor

weird that you instantly jumped to his defense with regards to bombing civilians all over the world.

Show me ONE TIME I defended him you lying, disingenuous prick.

Remember this?


and this?



by Victor

no, Im pretty sure thats how stats work

If you’re a global warming skeptic that’s how stats work. If you’re someone interested in making sound statistical inferences that’s not how stats work.

Reply...