President Donald Trump
I assume it's still acceptable to have a Trump thread in a Politics forum?
So this is an obvious lie - basically aimed at
Like almost all conspiracy theories, I'm inclined to take the event at face value. But I'll add that, if there was any serious presidential candidate, past or present, that would ever concoct such a thing , it would be trump.
I have a hard time believing he could follow such a choregraphie and that even anyone would trust him not to fk this up.
Yeah, this is similar to people saying Biden is too senile to wipe his ass, yet a brilliant mastermind behind rigging elections and weaponizing the DOJ. Then when you point out the disparity, they say it's establishment Democrats that did the masterminding, and you remind them that Hillary would have never lost if that was the case, and so it goes...
I thought the more plausible theory was that the bullet ricocheted off something (podium or teleprompter) and he was hit by a fragment of that and not the actual bullet.
Either way, he knew how to capitalize on it and I know some people who think he's a fearless badass (they forget about the 5 draft deferments), but SS confirmed they killed the shooter and it wasn't until then that they let Trump stand up and do his act.
Yeah, this is similar to people saying Biden is too senile to wipe his ass, yet a brilliant mastermind behind rigging elections and weaponizing the DOJ. Then when you point out the disparity, they say it's establishment Democrats that did the masterminding, and you remind them that Hillary would have never lost if that was the case, and so it goes...I thought the more plausible
That was probably more likely the case actually, I hadn't heard that and I completely agree with you on him opportunistically capitalising on it and mentioned it myself earlier.
Yeah, this is similar to people saying Biden is too senile to wipe his ass, yet a brilliant mastermind behind rigging elections and weaponizing the DOJ. Then when you point out the disparity, they say it's establishment Democrats that did the masterminding, and you remind them that Hillary would have never lost if that was the case, and so it goes...I thought the more plausible
I don't even get the dem argument that biden wasn't gone 5 years ago.
Are they trying to convince us that repubs were lying the whole time about biden losing it for the last 5 years, while dems were hiding biden from the public for unknown reasons and while they were saying biden is sharp as a tack and then on debate day he got hit by a car and that is why all of a sudden he lost it?
Surely after he gets yanked from the ticket dems have to come clean and say "yes we were lying the last 5 years because we thought we could hide him for another couple months until after the election, but we forgot debates were a thing." At a certain point you just have to come clean and say "we stuck with biden because we don't currently have anyone electable to the general public but we are working on finding someone the public will like and being more honest with you".
I don't even get the dem argument that biden wasn't gone 5 years ago. Are they trying to convince us that repubs were lying the whole time about biden losing it for the last 5 years, while dems were hiding biden from the public for unknown reasons and while they were saying biden is sharp as a tack and then on debate day he got hit by a car and that is why all of a sudden he lo
What's up? As I've said many times before, Trump was so bad he lost his reelection to a dementia patient. Now times have flipped and Trump is the dementia patient in office but you haven't noticed because your mouth is tethered to his orange cock.
I don't hate it
Well, it takes two to tango, but having known some homophobes, they probably think him being accepting of their lifestyle is enabling their lifestyle. Lag is probably like that.
it wasn’t an attack on his values, it was pointing out how he centers himself in everything. this flavors all of his posting here - where in his mind, he’s so morally perfect that disagreement can only be explained as hatred or stupidity
even gay people only exist by his good grace. they’re not just gay, they’re gay because he “enables” them.
there’s a reason he didn’t respond when that was pointed out. it’s an indefensible statement that exposes the narcissism pretty clearly, and the only move left was to hope it would go away and thus why this man who responds to everything magically ignored that
Patsy.
Go watch a video of it and look at the blood on Trump. His ear and cheek, but nothing behind his ear. And tell me if you think that's plausibly a real injury you'd get from a bullet, or fake blood.
Try watching some WWE matches where they have used fake blood, see if what Trump has looks the same.
dear lord, i didn't know we had a ballistics and blood spatter expert in the forum - thank god for that
Patsy.
Go watch a video of it and look at the blood on Trump. His ear and cheek, but nothing behind his ear. And tell me if you think that's plausibly a real injury you'd get from a bullet, or fake blood.
Try watching some WWE matches where they have used fake blood, see if what Trump has looks the same.
Yeah, and the aliens are living among us and in the year 2034 they are going to bring the dinosaurs back that they’ve been hiding on another planet.
The mainstream media and dems have spent an unimaginable amount of time, energy and money over the last 10 years into making trump look as bad as possible but for some reason none of them are focusing on the assignation attempt that if they could prove was fake would sink him politically.
Yeah, and the aliens are living among us and in the year 2034 they are going to bring the dinosaurs back that they’ve been hiding on another planet. The mainstream media and dems have spent an unimaginable amount of time, energy and money over the last 10 years into making trump look as bad as possible but for some reason none of them are focusing on the assignation attempt tha
The media doesn't make him look bad. He just is bad. All they have to do is record it.
I think faking an assassination where multiple people died is right in line with what this administration has shown its more than willing to do to acquire or retain power
This is a very, very weak reason for choosing to believe in an alleged conspiracy. Trump and his administration are capable of doing a great many things that they in fact have not done. For example, I think Trump would have no moral objection to straight up rigging a vote count to win an election. But that doesn't mean that it is more likely than not that he in fact rigged the vote count in the 2024 election. Practical considerations and the absence of affirmative evidence strongly suggest that he did not do so.
This is a very, very weak reason for choosing to believe in an alleged conspiracy. Trump and his administration are capable of doing a great many things that they in fact have not done. For example, I think Trump would have no moral objection to straight up rigging a vote count to win an election. But that doesn't mean that it is more likely than not that he in fact rigged t
Inventing conspiracies about Trump will only give people an excuse to doubt the veracity of accounts of his actual frauds, crimes and conspiracies.
People say blatant stuff in media and social media all the time. The reasons can be many: Misinformation, mistake or muddying the waters. Trump is a corrupt fool which hates half his country and most of the world. And since hate and distrust is often mutual, it is probably not that hard to get people to believe lies. Caveat emptor is a good principle for reading news stories and social media takes, also those about Trump.
This is a very, very weak reason for choosing to believe in an alleged conspiracy. Trump and his administration are capable of doing a great many things that they in fact have not done. For example, I think Trump would have no moral objection to straight up rigging a vote count to win an election. But that doesn't mean that it is more likely than not that he in fact rigged t
I don't know if I am "choosing to believe in an alleged conspiracy" by stating its certainly possible it happened then assigning a spectrum of probabilities to that possibility
Its certainly easier to stomach that it was all some elaborate ruse and not just Donnie da Dove hitting a .000001% out on the river in an event that certainly played a role in his re-election where literally everything falls into place perfectly between the shot, the cover, the reveal, the photographers, the flag, and the pose
Its certainly easier to stomach that it was all some elaborate ruse and not just Donnie da Dove hitting a .000001% out on the river in an event that certainly played a role in his re-election where literally everything falls into place perfectly between the shot, the cover, the reveal, the photographers, the flag, and the pose
I also don't think we should be making decisions about what to believe based on what is easiest to stomach. It isn't easy for me to stomach that a sizeable percentage of the country apparently doesn't care, or doesn't care much, about democratic norms or civil liberties, but that seems to be the case.
I don't know if I am "choosing to believe in an alleged conspiracy" by stating its certainly possible it happened then assigning a spectrum of probabilities to that possibility
My point is that "X person is capable of Y" is necessary but obviously and woefully insufficient, so much so that it often makes sense to assign very little weight to this factor when deciding whether X in fact did Y.
Monkeys.
The line is hard and fast now. If you dont think trump is despicable you are an *******.
Monkeys.
The line is hard and fast now. If you dont think trump is despicable you are an *******.
According to Karoline Leavitt, this is a nothingburger because the video also portrayed Trump as a lion and other politicians as other animals. And according to her, I guess that it was mere coincidence that the Obamas were portrayed as apes.
What a ****ing joke.
According to Karoline Leavitt, this is a nothingburger because the video also portrayed Trump as a lion and other politicians as other animals. And according to her, I guess that it was mere coincidence that the Obamas were portrayed as apes.
What a ****ing joke.
Trump was sometimes mockingly portrayed as an orange ape of some sort during his first term.
