suntauri
suntauri
archangelAbout
math magicianIt is a thought that breaks free from absolutes and chains,
and the listener, still bound by those chains, does not perform the act of liberation.
He clings to shells of certainty instead of allowing his heart to think freely — not mastering his thoughts, but being mastered by them; not connecting, but retreating.
A discourse that collapses under the impossible, revealing the cage in which the perceiver keeps himself and resists dissolution.
when it comes to children, then also spiritual resources matter, and social too
you can have free and unlimited mind, and still have more, and more will be your mind
there's one god, but one can think of many, and who thinks beyond, thinks of one god and light
it depends. what's your opponents' thoughtsphere?
if you bet flop small, you can expect continues with QJ, QT, JT + backdoor fd stuff some of the time, and with Kx too. you'd like him to improve his Kx to two pair or trips to then stack off or loose more chips.
checking turn will usually get you to pick off valuebets of Ax and sometimes Kx, and bluffbarrels of his draws.
if you think he's passive, then continuing with big barrels yourself is better to get value from his made hands and protect against his unimproved lower equity drawing hands. he may often fold them on flop though, if he's playing around baseline. multiway continuing ranges are tighter.
if you think he did not continue with drawing hands on flop, because of his style or some other read, you may still play checkcall on turn vs his Ax and Kx part of range who may bet themselves, and then lead river, to make sure he doesn't check behind Kx.
this move is often paid off by players who I think you can expect to have as your opponents here.
if he checks behind turn, you can lead river too. he'll often pay you off with Kx, which he might not if you barrel turn, and he'll raise Ax for you to jam and get it in.
with the big bet on flop, you'll find players who will outright fold Ax.
give him a little bite, and when he feels the taste follow up with a big smack chilly cheese.
you don't have to serve the smackdown, he'll plate it himself.
diming the openness to light, protecting the absence of god - war.
god flows through mind, god flows through modern physics.
in a moment of mental stillness, the physicist meets god and his mystery in an intuitive revelation and lightful inspiration.
a meditative act where god appears magnetically and shines through space in his soul and mind.
in absence of light, there's chaos. spaghetti chaos.
but yeah, where you strike it is - being high (on god's spirit, light) or being void of god (low, dark).
hmmm,
If the cards were face up would you not want him to? (Head)
I think heart would answer "no, because I did not win"...
You wanted him to call (Head).
nooo, don't be so mean....
Why did he call the shove? (Heart)
your heart means that he did not follow his heart! your heart knows more than you think.
And this is the whole problem with attitude and emotion that I fight as a player. Although emotion did not slow me down in these two hands, I often play too timidly, for fear of being beaten. For example, I check behind somebody on the turn and miss the value bet. Same on the river.
I usually put half my mind into my heart, kind of an anchor. flowing like that, Im controlling not spacing out into mental fears and thoughts.
ready to quickly generate heartly courage for thin value bets. and if lucky access higher truths.
the technique is to think heartly anchored at top back mind, more of a contemplative state than blindly overanalytic (primarily)
oh you said mp doesn't realize he'll bubble too if he doesn't ship it vs bigstack ..
guess whatever.
- actually, you fold, maybe mp folds too, and he just called cause you called and wasn't aware that he has to win vs bigstack. then call is best, no matter what mp does
seems to be a live thing, that they're so loose
tough spot, we're rolling fine, even if they call - great odds and equity (bigstack wont often have KK).
but the caveat is, we can almost speak of a secure allin confrontation, if they're often that wide.
and if not now, then someone's gonna bubble soon, so we can def fold in the money
things change when people deviate from above ranges.
if they call too wide, we may want to pass on the closer shoves. if they call too tight, we may want to shove even wider.
especially ICM ranges can often be so different from what people know and do.
so we see that shoving is fine in ICM to apply pressure, and bigstack doesn't want to risk losing chips too.
calling ranges - covered or not - can be tighter, but shoving ranges - covered or not - can still be wide.
with shoving we do not immediately risk elimination, but only if called.
big doesn't risk his tournament life with a call, but he wants to preserve his chips to keep his good position.
thus we've leverage with shoves even against covering stacks, and of course more so against covered stacks.
here is a similar simulation where the shover covers the caller.
chipEV shoving and calling ranges are similar to above (a pip tighter),
but shover's ICM range is much wider
while caller's ICM range is much tighter
unfortunately OP disappeared,
but I looked it up. been confused about the top left corner first, where seven rows of players can be seen, and some appear to have false stacks and names.
can't tell anything about OP's setup, but when it comes to its result, it looks much better.
here is a similar one from gtowiz, with few shorties, bigstack in the big, and second in chips cutoff's opening and shoving range into covering stack in the big.
compared to his 12 big shoving range in chipEV
bigs chipEV calling range
and bigs much tighter ICM calling range
yeah generally trapping by the flatter is a serious consideration, I also just went with the assumption that he's likely calling loads of trash (trash since he'll dump it in the bin)
when it comes to him trapping, we prefer to have AK over QQ.
but generally it would require a serious vibe check before going with AK here - is he serious or nervous, trembling, or just wants to play?
don't exactly know why some players in your sim have doppelgängers - coco bubu lookalikes,
but few stacks are incorrect. especially BB with name SB is far too short.
must be a long night
devalue icm
it's inherently counterfeit
use it to exploit
(by that, Id go a pip wider than above mentioned range)
I roughly estimated your bubble factor, and since you're so short it might be around 1.5.
no guarantee for that number, but it's likely not going to be huge. I used another scenario for that estimate.
if you were bigger stacked and risked elimination, then your bubble factor could get as high as 2 or 3, or even 4. meaning an additional required equity of 16%, 25% or 30%.
if the bubble factor is 1.5 we need an additional equity of 10%.
hence we're crushing with AK.
as we're more than quadrupling if opp doesn't bubble us, we need roughly 25% equity in chipEV.
if the bubble was guaranteed to bust soon, we may have to consider that. but the other short stack might survive.
many hands have at least 35% equity vs opponent's range.
we also have to consider that two shorter stacks entered the pot before the chipleader, so I'd go with a range of hands that have at least 40% equity versus chipleader's 3bet squeezing range.
depending on his range, it could be something along
77+, AJ+, ATs+, KQs
