In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there are important, interesting or just plain weird things happening out there and a group of people can find these better than one.
I thought I would test with a thread for linking general news articles about "other news" and discussion. Perhaps it goes into the abyss that is page 2 and beyond, but it is worth a try.
Some guidelines:
- Try to find the "clean link", so that links to the news site directly and not a social media site. Avoid "amp-links" (google).
- Write some cliff notes on what it is about, especially if it is a video.
- It's not an excuse to make outlandish claims via proxy or link extremist content.
- If it's an editorial or opinion piece, it is polite to mark it as such.
- Note the language if it is not in English.
- There is no demand that such things be posted here, if you think a piece merits its own thread, then make one.
Luc, eugenics has been a topic that is off limits in P&S. If you continue, you risk being banned.
Luc, eugenics has been a topic that is off limits in P&S. If you continue, you risk being banned.
I am not defending eugenics whatever that might mean for the 20y old who mentioned that, or for cordie.
I am defending the possibility for others to talk about that and not be considered bad people if they do.
The vice president agrees, are we at the point where agreeing with the vice president on a topic is bannable offense in this forum?
If we can't even discuss and take sides on the political positions of the leadership of either party what's a political forum for?
"I hate this ethnicity and think we should do like the Nazis" (paraphrased) should of course be disqualifying for civil service.
.
Yes threats of violence against individuals or groups should be disqualifying.
But no threat of violence happened so why are you pretending it did?
See King Spew what I mean? Here people can claim that merely uttering "eugenics* is a treat of violence when it objectively, transparently isn't.
And are claiming that uttering that word , given the threat of violence, is disqualifying for public employment.
How can I counter this very real, very present political issue if I am not allowed to talk about eugenics as a topic?
Keep in mind the topic will become more common and more public now after this, violently so, because the right isn't the losing side anymore, social media isn't controlled by the left anymore, so this time it is actually different.
If you decide so king spew we won't discuss it anymore, sure. But that should include people who claim that "eugenics" comes with threats of violence (which it doesn't, and which even cordie admits can happen fully voluntarily).
You keep mentioning violence but that isn’t a distinction. Also saying “this will be violently more common because the right won” has some insane implications about the right being loaded to the brim with racists. Keep in mind that everyone here knows you are a racist with a racial tier system.
Luciom is feeling pretty emboldened today. Anything else you want to get out of your system?
You keep mentioning violence but that isn’t a distinction. Also saying “this will be violently more common because the right won” has some insane implications about the right being loaded to the brim with racists. Keep in mind that everyone here knows you are a racist with a racial tier system.
Luciom is feeling pretty emboldened today. Anything else you want to get out of your system?
how is violence not the biggest and most important distinction?
violently more common means it will generate the kind of reciprocating hatred we see here a thousands folds many many times.
Which on Reddit will mean what's left of the right will get banned, and on other social media will mean the left will break down in insane **** posting because the racists aren't banned anymore.
the right is loaded to the brim of racists according to the definition from the left of racism. Humanity is.
We never denied that. We denied that definition makes any sense to criticize something.
Most human societies even in the present have wide majorities of people thinking their own ethnicity/culture/religion is better than any other ethnicity/culture/religion.
That's how humans are.
I love that you are flat out saying you are a racist and that’s okay because you think you have majority support now
Manic high for our boy Lucio
I love that you are flat out saying you are a racist and that’s okay because you think you have majority support now
Manic high for our boy Lucio
i am saying almost every human being who ever lived is a racist under the leftist definition, which is why your definition is worse than useless.
keep in mind your own guys said the same (for whites) for a while, except they thought it was something people had to atone for.
remember when your guys claimed every white was racist? they were right according to their definition.
i am saying almost every human being who ever lived is a racist under the leftist definition, which is why your definition is worse than useless.
keep in mind your own guys said the same (for whites) for a while, except they thought it was something people had to atone for.
remember when your guys claimed every white was racist? they were right according to their definition.
This is legitimate lunacy posting. Who are “you guys”? You definitely aren’t talking about me or even to me it would seem.
This is legitimate lunacy posting. Who are “you guys”? You definitely aren’t talking about me or even to me it would seem.
the previously very high regarded (by the left) woke aristocrats.
like the author of this bestselling book
![](https://s3.amazonaws.com/twoplustwo-actually-definitely-helping-stud/userimages/pXS3CP3.jpg)
I am talking to you as if you were a representative of the worst wokism because you walk their line and speak their words every time you have a chance
the previously very high regarded (by the left) woke aristocrats.
like the author of this bestselling book
I am talking to you as if you were a representative of the worst wokism because you walk their line and speak their words every time you have a chance
My thoughts on the current situation seemingly aligned with housenuts. I don’t want to speak for him but that’s the impression I got.
But yeah worst wokism or something.
How about this. If one wants to talk about hate ing races, being racist, and a love for racist eugenics, do it from an anonymous account and not under your full name like some moron. It works great for you
FYI the gov't doesn't need to wait for the DOJ to edict, arrest, prosecute and sentence. The military operates outside of the public domain and can scoop anyone up at any time if they have evidence of treason, which is what selling out the country you swore to protect is. There's also a "gitmo" in Guam and other places since there's no more room at the inn.
My thoughts on the current situation seemingly aligned with housenuts. I don’t want to speak for him but that’s the impression I got.
But yeah worst wokism or something.
How about this. If one wants to talk about hate ing races, being racist, and a love for racist eugenics, do it from an anonymous account and not under your full name like some moron. It works great for you
the DOGE guy did it from another account, haven't you followed the topic at all?
and I am not making the claims he did, I am defending his right to make those claims in his private life without repercussions related to federal employment.
it was a terrible mistake to resign after being doxxed btw.
The times where people are punished for having legal right-wing ideas (no matter how extreme if legal and non violent) should have ended with the election
Ye, ranted and raved across X, for much of Friday morning,
dubbing himself a Nazi as he praised Hitler and Sean “Diddy” Combs,
who is currently awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges.
“Hitler was sooooo fresh,” said Ye,
“I DONT LIKE OR TRUST ANY JEWISH PERSON
AND THIS IS COMPLETELY SOBER WITH NO HENNESY.”
Ye, ranted and raved across X, for much of Friday morning,
dubbing himself a Nazi as he praised Hitler and Sean “Diddy” Combs,
who is currently awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges.
“Hitler was sooooo fresh,” said Ye,
“I DONT LIKE OR TRUST ANY JEWISH PERSON
AND THIS IS COMPLETELY SOBER WITH NO HENNESY.”
![](https://tptstorageaccount38381.blob.core.windows.net/images/resized_CCT4fFB.png?width=664&height=1440)
A Republican lawmaker made an unusual suggestion during a public
hearing on a bill that could lead to taxing the methane emissions of cows.
He asked — what if the state studied and potentially taxed the farts of sports fans?
FYI the gov't doesn't need to wait for the DOJ to edict, arrest, prosecute and sentence. The military operates outside of the public domain and can scoop anyone up at any time if they have evidence of treason, which is what selling out the country you swore to protect is. There's also a "gitmo" in Guam and other places since there's no more room at the inn.
Right but can you identify one person that this has happened to as you have been lying and claimed it happened to election officials from PA, Trump’s criminal jury and judge and now whoever you are lying bout after the new administration took over.
And no, I am not asking you to prove alien life exists when seeking one example of a person who’s family is claiming that they disappeared and are being tried/held/killed because they were found to have committed treason.
Yes threats of violence against individuals or groups should be disqualifying.
But no threat of violence happened so why are you pretending it did?
No threat of violence?
You've said numerous times that you believe in a state that deports people who show disobedience to the values of that country (whatever that means), and if they can't be deported then such criminal offences should be punishable by death.
And if that involves many such court cases and executions then to save time and money they could be tried together and executed together.
No threat of violence?
You've said numerous times that you believe in a state that deports people who show disobedience to the values of that country (whatever that means), and if they can't be deported then such criminal offences should be punishable by death.
And if that involves many such court cases and executions then to save time and money they could be tried together and executed together.
Man reread, we were talking the racist DOGE guy.
I just said that nonviolent racism shouldn't be socially sanctioned
Every time I hear the word doge I think of Dice in Casual Sex. It's not exact but close enough to make me lol
You keep mentioning violence but that isn’t a distinction. Also saying “this will be violently more common because the right won” has some insane implications about the right being loaded to the brim with racists. Keep in mind that everyone here knows you are a racist with a racial tier system.
Luciom is feeling pretty emboldened today. Anything else you want to get out of your system?
For a guy that doesn’t want to talk about eugenics, he sure has made his point over his last few points that he support eugenics, his affirmation of eugenic principles and requests to not demonize people who want to discuss eugenics. Kelhus would be proud.