Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k
I start this with some pictures:
nl2 -$8792.18 -82 buy ins below EV

nl5 (notice that pt4 shows party poker nl5 as nl4) -$5943.81

nl10 -$773.92 -15 buy ins below EV

Total loss -$15509.91

This is me playing nl2, nl5 and nl10 on party poker for one year.
My history begins somewhere in same period when they started to show WSOP shows in television. I think I have played 12-13 years nows mainly NL2, some amount of NL5 and little bit of NL10 what is the biggest stake i've ever played.
I've read all Sklansky, all Harrington, all Miller, watched huge amount of videos, bought trackers and calculators.
Still after those years and after that all I've lost huge amount of money on those stakes. I try to play my best but losing to huge suckouts like 95/5 favorite makes me really upset.
I've lost literally all my money including all my life savings to online poker. I want to try one last time to win those money back and little bit of extra. That's why $16k. What I need is support and guiding.
I had thread on micro forum but they deleted it just when people start to understand that this is real situation and not fake.
And if you wonder where that biggest loser comes from it was said by guy who has been playing for living many years. He said I'm the biggest loser in history counted as lost buy ins.
Paisiting i just did some math and it turns out it would take you 128,000 shoves in a row at $10nl to win back your $16k if you shoved every single hand and never got called.
What do you think of this? Do you still think $16k is attainable with your current strategy?
Now imagine adding a 0 to your numbers, which is closer to the amount that Paisting has lost over the years.
How would you approach a live game Paisting? One raise to your BB and then unleash hell and what would you do when it keeps happening? Given your attitude online I can't imagine it not ending with fists flying.
If you threaten to kill someone playing live they will kick you out and probably ban you. You truly are the biggest idiot in the history of the game. You are so fusking stupid.
You sometimes amaze me that you usually and most of the time talk and act like people who are real into poker and thinking somewhat clear. Excluding ImePaskaa who is total idiot. But he summarises also the lack of thinking in this scenario so that's why quote.
If there is chat it's part of the game. Never thought about why nowadays there is any few sites that has chat? Who benefits more from chat experienced or unexperienced player? You are right, just like any sports where is talking involved.
Now if we think how example Achmed still crying after complete humiliation by me after years and years and posting these chats. Do you think he didn't change he's game during our battle? I can tell he's stealing percent went down dramatically after I made actions.
If I were playing live and there is a guy who thinks he can push me around, you think he just keeps doing it if I use all tactics that there are available? Maybe casino will kick me out at some point. But do you think that guy will play all that time I would sit on that table same way? I can tell you there are really few people who will keep their acts same on these circumstances.